Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Masaitsu Nakajima

dblp:30/1793 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction-level parallelism
0.011991
OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications · ISCA 1991
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
out-of-order execution
0.011991
OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications · ISCA 1991
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction scheduling
static instruction scheduling
0.011991
OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications · ISCA 1991
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
superscalar processor
0.011991
OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications · ISCA 1991
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
branch prediction
0.011991
OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications · ISCA 1991
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › pipelining
pipeline hazard
0.011991
OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications · ISCA 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

VLSI design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Low Power Techniques for Mobile Application SoCs Based on Integrated Platform "UniPhier"
abstract
In this paper, we describe the various low power techniques for mobile application SoCs based on the integrated platform "UniPhier". To minimize SoC power dissipation, hierarchical approaches from UniPhier Soc level, UniPhier processor level, IPP (instruction parallel processor) level, and circuit level are adopted. As SoC level, 1) well functionally isolated 5 major units of UniPhier SoC architecture, 2) dedicated stream DMA controller which can minimize CPU load and memory access. As UniPhier processor level, 1) UniPhier processor consists of IPP with dedicated low power hardware engine, 2) VMP (virtual multi-processor) mechanism with micro sleep which can reduce average power consumption in case of multiple tasks concurrent operation, 3) intermittent operation with the combination of micro-sleep and clock/power down scheme in case of very light load operation. As IPP level, 1) sophisticated instruction fetch buffer mechanism which can reduce more than 50% memory access for instruction fetch. 2) Hierarchical and selective clock gating scheme by detailed clock power analysis and clock activity rate analysis on real application.) Optimized physical implementation with low-power library and selective use of custom macros. As circuit level, mixed body bias technique with fixed Id and fixed Vt control which can realize 85 % delay variation suppressed and 25% ED product improvement compared with the no body bias.
Masaitsu Nakajima, Takao Yamamoto, Masayuki Yamasaki, Tetsu Hosoki, Masaya Sumita
ASP-DAC1
1991 Parallel computer ADENART - its architecture and application
Hiroshi Kadota, Katsuyuki Kaneko, Ichiro Okabayashi, Tadashi Okamoto, T. Mimura, Yasuhiro Nakakura, Akiyoshi Wakatani, Masaitsu Nakajima, Junji Nishikawa, K. Zaiki, Tatsuo Nogi
ICS8
1991 OHMEGA: A VLSI Superscalar Processor Architecture for Numerical Applications
abstract
multiple instructions per clock cycle, there are at least four This paper describes a VLSI superscalar processor architecture which can sustain very high performance in numericai applications. The architecture performs instructionlevel scheduling statically by the compiler, and performs outof-order issuing and executing of instructions to decrease the stall on the pipelines that dynamically occurs in execution. In this architecture, a pair of instructions are fetched in every clock cycle, decoded simultaneously, and issued to corresponding execution pipelines independently. For ease of instruction-level scheduling by the compiler, the architecture provider: -i) rimultaneoun execution df almost all pairs of instructions including Store-Stare pair and Load-Store pair, ii) simple, low-latency, and easily-paired execution pipeline structure, and iii) high-capacity muiti-ported floating point registers and integer registers. Enhanced performance by the dynamic decrease of the pipeline hazards is achieved by i) efficient data dependency resolution with novel Directly Tag Compare (DTC) method, ii) non-penalty branch mechanism and simple control dependency resolution, and iii) large data transfer ability by the pipelined data cache and 128 bit wide bus bandwidth. An efficient data dependency resolutioi mechanism, which is realized by using the novel DTC method, synchronized pipeiine operation, and data bypassing network, permits out-of-order instruction issuing and execution. The idea of DTC method is similar to that of dynamic data-flaw architecture with tagged token. The non-penalty branches are realized by three techniques, delayed branch, LOOP instruction that executer counter decrement, compare, and branch in one clock cycle, and non-penalty conditional branch with predicted condition codes. These 'techniques contribute to the decrease of the pipeline stalls occurring at run time. The architecture can achieve 80MFLOPS/80MIPS peak performance at 4OMHz clock and sustain 1.4 to 3.6 times higher performance of simple Multiple Function Unit (MFU) type RISC processors by taking advantage of these techniques.
Masaitsu Nakajima, Hiraku Nakano, Yasuhiro Nakakura, Tadahiro Yoshida, Yoshiyuki Goi, Yuji Nakai, Reiji Segawa, Takeshi Kishida, Hiroshi Kadota
ISCA1