EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Juyoung Lee 0001
dblp:30/2129-1
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8111-6931ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 76% Deep learning architectures and training · 10% Generative modeling · 9% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
2.0 | 3 | 2025 | Fair Generation without Unfair Distortions: Debiasing Text-To-Image Generation with Entanglement-Free Attention · ICCV 2025 Revisiting the Importance of Amplifying Bias for Debiasing · AAAI 2023 Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
dataset bias |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Revisiting the Importance of Amplifying Bias for Debiasing · AAAI 2023 Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Revisiting the Importance of Amplifying Bias for Debiasing · AAAI 2023 Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fair Generation without Unfair Distortions: Debiasing Text-To-Image Generation with Entanglement-Free Attention · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
debiasing generative models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fair Generation without Unfair Distortions: Debiasing Text-To-Image Generation with Entanglement-Free Attention · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fair Generation without Unfair Distortions: Debiasing Text-To-Image Generation with Entanglement-Free Attention · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › algorithmic bias
bias amplification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Revisiting the Importance of Amplifying Bias for Debiasing · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Revisiting the Importance of Amplifying Bias for Debiasing · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
feature-level augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 0.9cross-attention adjustment · 0.9attribute sampling · 0.9reweighting · 0.7data sample selection · 0.7latent feature swapping · 0.5disentangled feature augmentation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fair Generation without Unfair Distortions: Debiasing Text-To-Image Generation with Entanglement-Free AttentionabstractRecent advancements in diffusion-based text-to-image (T2I) models have enabled the generation of high-quality and photorealistic images from text. However, they often exhibit societal biases related to gender, race, and socioeconomic status, thereby potentially reinforcing harmful stereotypes and shaping public perception in unintended ways. While existing bias mitigation methods demonstrate effectiveness, they often encounter attribute entanglement, where adjustments to attributes relevant to the bias (i.e., target attributes) unintentionally alter attributes unassociated with the bias (i.e., non-target attributes), causing undesirable distribution shifts. To address this challenge, we introduce Entanglement-Free Attention (EFA), a method that accurately incorporates target attributes (e.g., White, Black, and Asian) while preserving non-target attributes (e.g., background) during bias mitigation. At inference time, EFA randomly samples a target attribute with equal probability and adjusts the cross-attention in selected layers to incorporate the sampled attribute, achieving a fair distribution of target attributes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EFA outperforms existing methods in mitigating bias while preserving non-target attributes, thereby maintaining the original model's output distribution and generative capacity. Jeonghoon Park, Juyoung Lee 0001, Chaeyeon Chung, Jaegul Choo, Jindong Gu |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2023 | Revisiting the Importance of Amplifying Bias for DebiasingabstractIn image classification, debiasing aims to train a classifier to be less susceptible to dataset bias, the strong correlation between peripheral attributes of data samples and a target class. For example, even if the frog class in the dataset mainly consists of frog images with a swamp background (i.e., bias aligned samples), a debiased classifier should be able to correctly classify a frog at a beach (i.e., bias conflicting samples). Recent debiasing approaches commonly use two components for debiasing, a biased model fB and a debiased model fD. fB is trained to focus on bias aligned samples (i.e., overfitted to the bias) while fD is mainly trained with bias conflicting samples by concentrating on samples which fB fails to learn, leading fD to be less susceptible to the dataset bias. While the state of the art debiasing techniques have aimed to better train fD, we focus on training fB, an overlooked component until now. Our empirical analysis reveals that removing the bias conflicting samples from the training set for fB is important for improving the debiasing performance of fD. This is due to the fact that the bias conflicting samples work as noisy samples for amplifying the bias for fB since those samples do not include the bias attribute. To this end, we propose a simple yet effective data sample selection method which removes the bias conflicting samples to construct a bias amplified dataset for training fB. Our data sample selection method can be directly applied to existing reweighting based debiasing approaches, obtaining consistent performance boost and achieving the state of the art performance on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Jungsoo Lee, Jeonghoon Park, Juyoung Lee 0001, Edward Choi 0003, Jaegul Choo |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2021 | Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature AugmentationabstractImage classification models tend to make decisions based on peripheral attributes of data items that have strong correlation with a target variable (i.e., dataset bias). These biased models suffer from the poor generalization capability when evaluated on unbiased datasets. Existing approaches for debiasing often identify and emphasize those samples with no such correlation (i.e., bias-conflicting) without defining the bias type in advance. However, such bias-conflicting samples are significantly scarce in biased datasets, limiting the debiasing capability of these approaches. This paper first presents an empirical analysis revealing that training with "diverse" bias-conflicting samples beyond a given training set is crucial for debiasing as well as the generalization capability. Based on this observation, we propose a novel feature-level data augmentation technique in order to synthesize diverse bias-conflicting samples. To this end, our method learns the disentangled representation of (1) the intrinsic attributes (i.e., those inherently defining a certain class) and (2) bias attributes (i.e., peripheral attributes causing the bias), from a large number of bias-aligned samples, the bias attributes of which have strong correlation with the target variable. Using the disentangled representation, we synthesize bias-conflicting samples that contain the diverse intrinsic attributes of bias-aligned samples by swapping their latent features. By utilizing these diversified bias-conflicting features during the training, our approach achieves superior classification accuracy and debiasing results against the existing baselines on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Jungsoo Lee, Eungyeup Kim, Juyoung Lee 0001, Jihyeon Lee, Jaegul Choo |
NeurIPS | 3 |