Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joaquin Quiñonero Candela
dblp:30/2370
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0009-0004-5149-3228ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 58% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10% Reinforcement learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 69% Information retrieval · 21% Data mining · 10% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse gaussian process regression |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Sparse Spectrum Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | Sparse Spectrum Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 Gaussian Process Priors with Uncertain Inputs - Application to Multiple-Step Ahead Time Series Forecasting · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Local distance preservation in the GP-LVM through back constraints · ICML 2006 Large margin non-linear embedding · ICML 2005 |
Recommender systems
click-through rate prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsoft's Bing Search Engine · ICML 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 Gaussian Process Priors with Uncertain Inputs - Application to Multiple-Step Ahead Time Series Forecasting · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
relevance vector machine |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Healing the relevance vector machine through augmentation · ICML 2005 Incremental Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
sparse bayesian learning |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Healing the relevance vector machine through augmentation · ICML 2005 Incremental Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent gaussian model
gaussian process latent variable model |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Local distance preservation in the GP-LVM through back constraints · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Healing the relevance vector machine through augmentation · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
predictive uncertainty |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Healing the relevance vector machine through augmentation · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Large margin non-linear embedding · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
mean-field approximation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Incremental Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series modeling
multi-step prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Gaussian Process Priors with Uncertain Inputs - Application to Multiple-Step Ahead Time Series Forecasting · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Incremental Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
large-scale learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Sparse Spectrum Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
sponsored search |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsoft's Bing Search Engine · ICML 2010 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Large margin non-linear embedding · ICML 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
counterfactual reasoning · 0.2gaussian process · 0.1spectral approximation · 0.1random features · 0.1logistic regression · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1semi-supervised logistic regression · 0.1entropy-based embedding · 0.1back constraints · 0.1sparse approximation · 0.1effective prior · 0.1augmentation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising
Léon Bottou, Jonas Peters, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Denis Xavier Charles, David Maxwell Chickering, Elon Portugaly, Dipankar Ray, Patrice Y. Simard, Ed Snelson |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2010 | Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsoft's Bing Search Engine
Thore Graepel, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Thomas Borchert, Ralf Herbrich |
ICML | 2 |
| 2010 | Sparse Spectrum Gaussian Process Regression
Miguel Lázaro-Gredilla, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Carl E. Rasmussen, Aníbal R. Figueiras-Vidal |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2006 | Local distance preservation in the GP-LVM through back constraintsabstractThe Gaussian process latent variable model (GP-LVM) is a generative approach to nonlinear low dimensional embedding, that provides a smooth probabilistic mapping from latent to data space. It is also a non-linear generalization of probabilistic PCA (PPCA) (Tipping & Bishop, 1999). While most approaches to non-linear dimensionality methods focus on preserving local distances in data space, the GP-LVM focusses on exactly the opposite. Being a smooth mapping from latent to data space, it focusses on keeping things apart in latent space that are far apart in data space. In this paper we first provide an overview of dimensionality reduction techniques, placing the emphasis on the kind of distance relation preserved. We then show how the GP-LVM can be generalized, through back constraints, to additionally preserve local distances. We give illustrative experiments on common data sets. Neil D. Lawrence, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela |
ICML | 2 |
| 2005 | Healing the relevance vector machine through augmentationabstractThe Relevance Vector Machine (RVM) is a sparse approximate Bayesian kernel method. It provides full predictive distributions for test cases. However, the predictive uncertainties have the unintuitive property, that they get smaller the further you move away from the training cases. We give a thorough analysis. Inspired by the analogy to non-degenerate Gaussian Processes, we suggest augmentation to solve the problem. The purpose of the resulting model, RVM*, is primarily to corroborate the theoretical and experimental analysis. Although RVM* could be used in practical applications, it is no longer a truly sparse model. Experiments show that sparsity comes at the expense of worse predictive. distributions. Carl E. Rasmussen, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela |
ICML | 2 |
| 2005 | Large margin non-linear embeddingabstractIt is common in classification methods to first place data in a vector space and then learn decision boundaries. We propose reversing that process: for fixed decision boundaries, we "learn" the location of the data. This way we (i) do not need a metric (or even stronger structure) - pairwise dissimilarities suffice; and additionally (ii) produce low-dimensional embeddings that can be analyzed visually. We achieve this by combining an entropy-based embedding method with an entropy-based version of semi-supervised logistic regression. We present results for clustering and semi-supervised classification. Alexander Zien, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela |
ICML | 2 |
| 2005 | A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process RegressionabstractWe provide a new unifying view, including all existing proper probabilistic sparse approximations for Gaussian process regression. Our approach relies on expressing the effective prior which the methods are using. This allows new insights to be gained, and highlights the relationship between existing methods. It also allows for a clear theoretically justified ranking of the closeness of the known approximations to the corresponding full GPs. Finally we point directly to designs of new better sparse approximations, combining the best of the existing strategies, within attractive computational constraints. Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Carl E. Rasmussen |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2003 | Propagation of uncertainty in Bayesian kernel models - application to multiple-step ahead forecastingabstractThe object of Bayesian modelling is predictive distribution, which, in a forecasting scenario, enables evaluation of forecasted values and their uncertainties. We focus on reliably estimating the predictive mean and variance of forecasted values using Bayesian kernel based models such as the Gaussian process and the relevance vector machine. We derive novel analytic expressions for the predictive mean and variance for Gaussian kernel shapes under the assumption of a Gaussian input distribution in the static case, and of a recursive Gaussian predictive density in iterative forecasting. The capability of the method is demonstrated for forecasting of time-series and compared to approximate methods. Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Agathe Girard, Jan Larsen, Carl E. Rasmussen |
ICASSP (2) | 1 |
| 2002 | Time series prediction based on the Relevance Vector Machine with adaptive kernelsabstractThe Relevance Vector Machine (RVM) introduced by Tipping is a probabilistic model similar to the widespread Support Vector Machines (SVM), but where the training takes place in a Bayesian framework, and where predictive distributions of the outputs instead of point estimates are obtained. In this paper we focus on the use of RVM's for regression. We modify this method for training generalized linear models by adapting automatically the width of the basis functions to the optimal for the data at hand. Our Adaptive RVM is tried for prediction on the chaotic Mackey-Glass time series. Much superior performance than with the standard RVM and than with other methods like neural networks and local linear models is obtained. Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Lars Kai Hansen |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2002 | Incremental Gaussian ProcessesabstractIn this paper, we consider Tipping’s relevance vector machine (RVM) [1] and formalize an incremental training strategy as a variant of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm that we call Subspace EM (SSEM). Working with a subset of active basis functions, the sparsity of the RVM solution will ensure that the number of basis functions and thereby the computational complexity is kept low. We also introduce a mean field approach to the intractable classification model that is ex- pected to give a very good approximation to exact Bayesian inference and contains the Laplace approximation as a special case. We test the algorithms on two large data sets with O(103 (cid:0) 104) examples. The re- sults indicate that Bayesian learning of large data sets, e.g. the MNIST database is realistic. Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Ole Winther |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2002 | Gaussian Process Priors with Uncertain Inputs - Application to Multiple-Step Ahead Time Series ForecastingabstractWe consider the problem of multi-step ahead prediction in time series analysis using the non-parametric Gaussian process model. -step ahead forecasting of a discrete-time non-linear dynamic system can be per- formed by doing repeated one-step ahead predictions. For a state-space at time model of the form is based on the point estimates of the previous outputs. In this pa- per, we show how, using an analytical Gaussian approximation, we can formally incorporate the uncertainty about intermediate regressor values, thus updating the uncertainty on the current prediction. Agathe Girard, Carl E. Rasmussen, Joaquin Quiñonero Candela, Roderick Murray-Smith |
NIPS | 3 |