Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jing Chang 0006

dblp:30/2583-6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2708-3921ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 67% Vision and language · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.912025
Cross-Modal Dual-Causal Learning for Long-Term Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition › temporal action recognition
long-term action recognition
0.912025
Cross-Modal Dual-Causal Learning for Long-Term Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Cross-Modal Dual-Causal Learning for Long-Term Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural causal model · 0.9causal intervention · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Cross-Modal Dual-Causal Learning for Long-Term Action Recognition
abstract
Long-term action recognition (LTAR) is challenging due to extended temporal spans with complex atomic action correlations and visual confounders. Although vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promise, they often rely on statistical correlations instead of causal mechanisms. Moreover, existing causality-based methods address modal-specific biases but lack cross-modal causal modeling, limiting their utility in VLM-based LTAR. This paper proposes Cross-Modal Dual-Causal Learning (CMDCL), which introduces a structural causal model to uncover causal relationships between videos and label texts. CMDCL addresses cross-modal biases in text embeddings via textual causal intervention and removes confounders inherent in the visual modality through visual causal intervention guided by the debiased text. These dual-causal interventions enable robust action representations to address LTAR challenges. Experimental results on three benchmarks including Charades, Breakfast and COIN, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Our code is available at https://github.com/xushaowu/CMDCL.
Shaowu Xu, Xibin Jia, Junyu Gao 0002, Qianmei Sun, Jing Chang 0006, Chao Fan 0001
ACM Multimedia5
2025 Temporal fidelity enhancement for video action recognition
abstract
Temporal attention mechanisms are essential for video action recognition, enabling models to focus on semantically informative moments. However, these models frequently exhibit temporal infidelity—misaligned attention weights caused by limited training diversity and the absence of fine-grained temporal supervision. While video-level labels provide coarse-grained action guidance, the lack of detailed constraints allows attention noise to persist, especially in complex scenarios with distracting spatial elements. To address this issue, we propose temporal fidelity enhancement (TFE), a competitive learning paradigm based on the disentangled information bottleneck (DisenIB) theory. TFE mitigates temporal infidelity by decoupling action-relevant semantics from spurious correlations through adversarial feature disentanglement. Using pre-trained representations for initialization, TFE establishes an adversarial process in which segments with elevated temporal attention compete against contexts with diminished action relevance. This mechanism ensures temporal consistency and enhances the fidelity of attention patterns without requiring explicit fine-grained supervision. Extensive studies on UCF101, HMDB-51, and Charades benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our method, with significant improvements in action recognition accuracy.
Shaowu Xu, Xibin Jia, Qianmei Sun, Jing Chang 0006
Frontiers Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng.4