Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrei Belitski
dblp:30/3597
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › large margin methods
minimax probability machine |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
sparse kernel methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine Classification · NIPS 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
greedy basis selection · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Sparse Greedy Minimax Probability Machine ClassificationabstractThe Minimax Probability Machine Classification (MPMC) framework [Lanckriet et al., 2002] builds classifiers by minimizing the maximum probability of misclassification, and gives direct estimates of the proba- bilistic accuracy bound Ω. The only assumptions that MPMC makes is that good estimates of means and covariance matrices of the classes exist. However, as with Support Vector Machines, MPMC is computationally expensive and requires extensive cross validation experiments to choose kernels and kernel parameters that give good performance. In this paper we address the computational cost of MPMC by proposing an algorithm that constructs nonlinear sparse MPMC (SMPMC) models by incremen- tally adding basis functions (i.e. kernels) one at a time – greedily select- ing the next one that maximizes the accuracy bound Ω. SMPMC auto- matically chooses both kernel parameters and feature weights without us- ing computationally expensive cross validation. Therefore the SMPMC algorithm simultaneously addresses the problem of kernel selection and feature selection (i.e. feature weighting), based solely on maximizing the accuracy bound Ω. Experimental results indicate that we can obtain reli- able bounds Ω, as well as test set accuracies that are comparable to state of the art classification algorithms. Thomas Strohmann, Andrei Belitski, Gregory Z. Grudic, Dennis DeCoste |
NIPS | 2 |