EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Narayanan Sundaram
dblp:30/3638
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 13 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
16 papers |
High-performance computing · 35% Parallel and multicore computing · 26% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Information retrieval · 37% Data mining · 35% Graph data management · 20% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 57% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 43% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 43% Computational geometry · 15% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 56, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Galactos: computing the anisotropic 3-point correlation function for 2 billion galaxies · SC 2017 Full correlation matrix analysis of fMRI data on Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors · SC 2015 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | BD-CATS: big data clustering at trillion particle scale · SC 2015 Pardicle: Parallel Approximate Density-Based Clustering · SC 2014 |
Data mining › clustering
density-based clustering |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | BD-CATS: big data clustering at trillion particle scale · SC 2015 Pardicle: Parallel Approximate Density-Based Clustering · SC 2014 |
Distributed systems
graph processing systems |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | GraphMat: High performance graph analytics made productive · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 Navigating the maze of graph analytics frameworks using massive graph datasets · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
High-performance computing › large-scale simulation
cosmological simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Galactos: computing the anisotropic 3-point correlation function for 2 billion galaxies · SC 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing
distributed deep learning training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017 |
High-performance computing
many-core acceleration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Galactos: computing the anisotropic 3-point correlation function for 2 billion galaxies · SC 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing
MPI |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bridging the Gap between HPC and Big Data frameworks · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bridging the Gap between HPC and Big Data frameworks · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Galactos: computing the anisotropic 3-point correlation function for 2 billion galaxies · SC 2017 |
Graph data management › graph analytics
large-scale graph analytics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | LDBC Graphalytics: A Benchmark for Large-Scale Graph Analysis on Parallel and Distributed Platforms · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | LDBC Graphalytics: A Benchmark for Large-Scale Graph Analysis on Parallel and Distributed Platforms · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
graph processing accelerator |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Graphicionado: A high-performance and energy-efficient accelerator for graph analytics · MICRO 2016 |
Memory systems
hybrid memory |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Data tiering in heterogeneous memory systems · EuroSys 2016 |
Storage systems › storage hierarchy
tiered storage |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Data tiering in heterogeneous memory systems · EuroSys 2016 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
b-matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Designing scalable b-Matching algorithms on distributed memory multiprocessors by approximation · SC 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Designing scalable b-Matching algorithms on distributed memory multiprocessors by approximation · SC 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scientific machine learning
neural surrogate model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2015 |
Graph data management
graph analytics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | GraphMat: High performance graph analytics made productive · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | GenBase: a complex analytics genomics benchmark · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
Parallel and multicore computing
graph processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Navigating the maze of graph analytics frameworks using massive graph datasets · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Streaming Similarity Search over one Billion Tweets using Parallel Locality-Sensitive Hashing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013 |
Information retrieval › hashing › hashing for nearest neighbor search
locality-sensitive hashing |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Streaming Similarity Search over one Billion Tweets using Parallel Locality-Sensitive Hashing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013 |
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Streaming Similarity Search over one Billion Tweets using Parallel Locality-Sensitive Hashing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013 |
Information retrieval
similarity search |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Streaming Similarity Search over one Billion Tweets using Parallel Locality-Sensitive Hashing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › big data analytics
scalable analytics |
0.1 | 2 | 2015 | BD-CATS: big data clustering at trillion particle scale · SC 2015 Pardicle: Parallel Approximate Density-Based Clustering · SC 2014 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Dense Point Trajectories by GPU-Accelerated Large Displacement Optical Flow · ECCV (1) 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
MPI · 1.2OpenMP · 0.9synchronous and asynchronous training · 0.6spherical harmonic expansion · 0.6semi-supervised learning · 0.6load balancing · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6SIMD parallelism · 0.6spark · 0.3performance modeling · 0.2approximation algorithm · 0.2vertex programming · 0.2sparse matrix operations · 0.2kd-tree · 0.2intel xeon phi coprocessor optimization · 0.2geometric partitioning · 0.2gaussian process · 0.2adaptive basis function regression · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Matrix-normal models for fMRI analysisabstractMultivariate analysis of fMRI data has bene- fited substantially from advances in machine learning. Most recently, a range of prob- abilistic latent variable models applied to fMRI data have been successful in a variety of tasks, including identifying similarity pat- terns in neural data, combining multi-subject datasets, and mapping between brain and be- havior. Although these methods share some underpinnings, they have been developed as distinct methods, with distinct algorithms and software tools. We show how the matrix- variate normal (MN) formalism can unify some of these methods into a single frame- work. In doing so, we gain the ability to reuse noise modeling assumptions, algorithms, and code across models. Our primary theoretical contribution shows how some of these meth- ods can be written as instantiations of the same model, allowing us to generalize them to flexibly modeling structured noise covari- ances. Our formalism permits novel model variants and improved estimation strategies for SRM and RSA using substantially fewer parameters. We empirically demonstrate ad- vantages of our two new methods: for MN-RSA, we show up to 10x improvement in run- time, up to 6x improvement in RMSE, and more conservative behavior under the null. For MN-SRM, our method grants a modest improvement to out-of-sample reconstruction while relaxing the orthonormality constraint of SRM. We also provide a software prototyp- ing tool for MN models that can flexibly reuse noise covariance assumptions and algorithms across models. Michael Shvartsman, Narayanan Sundaram, Mikio C. Aoi, Adam Charles, Theodore L. Willke, Jonathan D. Cohen 0003 |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2017 | Galactos: computing the anisotropic 3-point correlation function for 2 billion galaxiesabstractThe nature of dark energy and the complete theory of gravity are two central questions currently facing cosmology. A vital tool for addressing them is the 3-point correlation function (3PCF), which probes deviations from a spatially random distribution of galaxies. However, the 3PCF's formidable computational expense has prevented its application to astronomical surveys comprising millions to billions of galaxies. We present Galactos, a high-performance implementation of a novel, O(N2) algorithm that uses a load-balanced k-d tree and spherical harmonic expansions to compute the anisotropic 3PCF. Our implementation is optimized for the Intel Xeon Phi architecture, exploiting SIMD parallelism, instruction and thread concurrency, and significant L1 and L2 cache reuse, reaching 39% of peak performance on a single node. Galactos scales to the full Cori system, achieving 9.8 PF (peak) and 5.06 PF (sustained) across 9636 nodes, making the 3PCF easily computable for all galaxies in the observable universe. Brian Friesen, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Brian Austin, Nadathur Satish, Zachary Slepian, Narayanan Sundaram, Deborah Bard, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Jack Deslippe, Pradeep Dubey, Prabhat |
SC | 6 |
| 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific dataabstractThis paper presents the first, 15-PetaFLOP Deep Learning system for solving scientific pattern classification problems on contemporary HPC architectures. We develop supervised convolutional architectures for discriminating signals in high-energy physics data as well as semi-supervised architectures for localizing and classifying extreme weather in climate data. Our Intelcaffe-based implementation obtains ~2TFLOP/s on a single Cori Phase-II Xeon-Phi node. We use a hybrid strategy employing synchronous node-groups, while using asynchronous communication across groups. We use this strategy to scale training of a single model to ~9600 Xeon-Phi nodes; obtaining peak performance of 11.73-15.07 PFLOP/s and sustained performance of 11.41-13.27 PFLOP/s. At scale, our HEP architecture produces state-of-the-art classification accuracy on a dataset with 10M images, exceeding that achieved by selections on high-level physics-motivated features. Our semi-supervised architecture successfully extracts weather patterns in a 15TB climate dataset. Our results demonstrate that Deep Learning can be optimized and scaled effectively on many-core, HPC systems. Thorsten Kurth, Jian Zhang 0049, Nadathur Satish, Evan Racah, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Tareq M. Malas, Narayanan Sundaram, Wahid Bhimji, Mikhail Smorkalov, Jack Deslippe, Mikhail Shiryaev, Srinivas Sridharan 0002, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey |
SC | 8 |
| 2017 | Bridging the Gap between HPC and Big Data frameworksabstractApache Spark is a popular framework for data analytics with attractive features such as fault tolerance and interoperability with the Hadoop ecosystem. Unfortunately, many analytics operations in Spark are an order of magnitude or more slower compared to native implementations written with high performance computing tools such as MPI. There is a need to bridge the performance gap while retaining the benefits of the Spark ecosystem such as availability, productivity, and fault tolerance. In this paper, we propose a system for integrating MPI with Spark and analyze the costs and benefits of doing so for four distributed graph and machine learning applications. We show that offloading computation to an MPI environment from within Spark provides 3.1−17.7× speedups on the four sparse applications, including all of the overheads. This opens up an avenue to reuse existing MPI libraries in Spark with little effort. Michael J. Anderson, Shaden Smith, Narayanan Sundaram, Mihai Capota, Zheguang Zhao, Subramanya Dulloor, Nadathur Satish, Theodore L. Willke |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2016 | Real-time full correlation matrix analysis of fMRI dataabstractReal-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) is an emerging approach for studying the functioning of the human brain. Computational challenges combined with high data velocity have to this point restricted rtfMRI analyses to studying regions of the brain independently. However, given that neural processing is accomplished via functional interactions among brain regions, neuroscience could stand to benefit from rtfMRI analyses of full-brain interactions. In this paper, we extend such an offline analysis method, full correlation matrix analysis (FCMA), to enable its use in rtfMRI studies. Specifically, we introduce algorithms capable of processing real-time data for all stages of the FCMA machine learning workflow: incremental feature selection, model updating, and real-time classification. We also present an actor-model based distributed system designed to support FCMA and other rtfMRI analysis methods. Experiments show that our system successfully analyzes a stream of brain volumes and returns neurofeedback with less than 180 ms of lag. Our real-time FCMA implementation provides the same accuracy as an optimized offline FCMA toolbox while running 3.6–6.2x faster. Yida Wang 0003, Bryn Keller, Mihai Capota, Michael J. Anderson, Narayanan Sundaram, Jonathan D. Cohen 0003, Kai Li 0001, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Theodore L. Willke |
IEEE BigData | 5 |
| 2016 | GraphIn: An Online High Performance Incremental Graph Processing Framework
Dipanjan Sengupta, Narayanan Sundaram, Theodore L. Willke, Jeffrey Young 0001, Matthew Wolf, Karsten Schwan |
Euro-Par | 2 |
| 2016 | Data tiering in heterogeneous memory systemsabstractMemory-based data center applications require increasingly large memory capacities, but face the challenges posed by the inherent difficulties in scaling DRAM and also the cost of DRAM. Future systems are attempting to address these demands with heterogeneous memory architectures coupling DRAM with high capacity, low cost, but also lower performance, non-volatile memories (NVM) such as PCM and RRAM. A key usage model intended for NVM is as cheaper high capacity volatile memory. Data center operators are bound to ask whether this model for the usage of NVM to replace the majority of DRAM memory leads to a large slowdown in their applications? It is crucial to answer this question because a large performance impact will be an impediment to the adoption of such systems. Subramanya Dulloor, Amitabha Roy 0002, Zheguang Zhao, Narayanan Sundaram, Nadathur Satish, Rajesh Sankaran, Jeff Jackson, Karsten Schwan |
EuroSys | 4 |
| 2016 | GraphPad: Optimized Graph Primitives for Parallel and Distributed PlatformsabstractThe duality between graphs and matrices means that many common graph analyses can be expressed with primitives such as generalized sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMSpV) and sparse matrix-matrix multiplication (SpGEMM). Achieving high performance on these primitives is challenging due to limited arithmetic intensity, irregular memory accesses, and significant network communication requirements in the distributed setting. In this paper we implement four graph applications using GraphPad, our optimized multinode implementations of generalized linear algebra primitives such as SpMSpV and SpGEMM. GraphPad is highly flexible to accommodate multiple data layouts, partitioning strategies, and incorporates communication optimizations. Our performance at scale can exceed that of CombBLAS by up to 40×. In addition to GraphPad's performance in a distributed setting, it is also within 2× the performance of GraphMat, a high performance graph framework on a single node for four out of five benchmarks. We also show our communication optimizations and flexibility are critical for good performance on both HPC clusters and commodity cloud platforms. Michael J. Anderson, Narayanan Sundaram, Nadathur Satish, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Theodore L. Willke, Pradeep Dubey |
IPDPS | 2 |
| 2016 | PANDA: Extreme Scale Parallel K-Nearest Neighbor on Distributed ArchitecturesabstractComputing k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) is one of the core kernels used in many machine learning, data mining and scientific computing applications. Although kd-tree based O(log n) algorithms have been proposed for computing KNN, due to its inherent sequentiality, linear algorithms are being used in practice. This limits the applicability of such methods to millions of data points, with limited scalability for Big Data analytics challenges in the scientific domain. In this paper, we present parallel and highly optimized kd*tree based KNN algorithms (both construction and querying) suitable for distributed architectures. Our algorithm includes novel approaches for pruning search space and improving load balancing and partitioning among nodes and threads. Using TB-sized datasets from three science applications: astrophysics, plasma physics, and particle physics, we show that our implementation can construct kd-tree of 189 billion particles in 48 seconds on utilizing ~50,000 cores. We also demonstrate computation of KNN of 19 billion queries in 12 seconds. We demonstrate almost linear speedup both for shared and distributed memory computers. Our algorithms outperforms earlier implementations by more than order of magnitude, thereby radically improving the applicability of our implementation to state-of-the-art Big Data analytics problems. Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Jialin Liu 0002, Peter J. Sadowski, Evan Racah, Surendra Byna, Craig Tull, Wahid Bhimji, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey |
IPDPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Graphicionado: A high-performance and energy-efficient accelerator for graph analyticsabstractGraphs are one of the key data structures for many real-world computing applications and the importance of graph analytics is ever-growing. While existing software graph processing frameworks improve programmability of graph analytics, underlying general purpose processors still limit the performance and energy efficiency of graph analytics. We architect a domain-specific accelerator, Graphicionado, for high-performance, energy-efficient processing of graph analytics workloads. For efficient graph analytics processing, Graphicionado exploits not only data structure-centric datapath specialization, but also memory subsystem specialization, all the while taking advantage of the parallelism inherent in this domain. Graphicionado augments the vertex programming paradigm, allowing different graph analytics applications to be mapped to the same accelerator framework, while maintaining flexibility through a small set of reconfigurable blocks. This paper describes Graphicionado pipeline design choices in detail and gives insights on how Graphicionado combats application execution inefficiencies on general-purpose CPUs. Our results show that Graphicionado achieves a 1.76-6.54x speedup while consuming 50-100x less energy compared to a state-of-the-art software graph analytics processing framework executing 32 threads on a 16-core Haswell Xeon processor. Tae Jun Ham, Lisa Wu Wills, Narayanan Sundaram, Nadathur Satish, Margaret Martonosi |
MICRO | 3 |
| 2016 | Designing scalable b-Matching algorithms on distributed memory multiprocessors by approximationabstractA b-MATCHING is a subset of edges M such that at most b(v) edges in M are incident on each vertex v, where b(v) is specified. We present a distributed-memory parallel algorithm, b-SUITOR, that computes a b-MATCHING with more than half the maximum weight in a graph with weights on the edges. The approximation algorithm is designed to have high concurrency and low time complexity. We organize the implementation of the algorithm in terms of asynchronous supersteps that combine computation and communication, and balance the computational work and frequency of communication to obtain high performance. Since the performance of the b-SUITOR algorithm is strongly influenced by communication, we present several strategies to reduce the communication volume. We implement the algorithm using a hybrid strategy where inter-node communication uses MPI and intra-node computation is done with OpenMP threads. We demonstrate strong and weak scaling of b-SUITOR up to 16K processors on two supercomputers at NERSC. We compute a b-MATCHING in a graph with 2 billion edges in under 4 seconds using 16K processors. Arif M. Khan, Alex Pothen, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Mahantesh Halappanavar, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Pradeep Dubey |
SC | 6 |
| 2016 | LDBC Graphalytics: A Benchmark for Large-Scale Graph Analysis on Parallel and Distributed PlatformsabstractIn this paper we introduce LDBC Graphalytics, a new industrial-grade benchmark for graph analysis platforms. It consists of six deterministic algorithms, standard datasets, synthetic dataset generators, and reference output, that enable the objective comparison of graph analysis platforms. Its test harness produces deep metrics that quantify multiple kinds of system scalability, such as horizontal/vertical and weak/strong, and of robustness, such as failures and performance variability. The benchmark comes with open-source software for generating data and monitoring performance. We describe and analyze six implementations of the benchmark (three from the community, three from the industry), providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the platforms. Key to our contribution, vendors perform the tuning and benchmarking of their platforms. Alexandru Iosup, Tim Hegeman, Wing Lung Ngai, Stijn Heldens, Arnau Prat-Pérez, Thomas Manhardt, Hassan Chafi, Mihai Capota, Narayanan Sundaram, Michael J. Anderson, Ilie Gabriel Tanase, Yinglong Xia, Lifeng Nai, Peter Boncz |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 9 |
| 2015 | Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural NetworksabstractBayesian optimization is an effective methodology for the global optimization of functions with expensive evaluations. It relies on querying a distribution over functions defined by a relatively cheap surrogate model. An accurate model for this distribution over functions is critical to the effectiveness of the approach, and is typically fit using Gaussian processes (GPs). However, since GPs scale cubically with the number of observations, it has been challenging to handle objectives whose optimization requires many evaluations, and as such, massively parallelizing the optimization. In this work, we explore the use of neural networks as an alternative to GPs to model distributions over functions. We show that performing adaptive basis function regression with a neural network as the parametric form performs competitively with state-of-the-art GP-based approaches, but scales linearly with the number of data rather than cubically. This allows us to achieve a previously intractable degree of parallelism, which we apply to large scale hyperparameter optimization, rapidly finding competitive models on benchmark object recognition tasks using convolutional networks, and image caption generation using neural language models. Jasper Snoek, Oren Rippel, Kevin Swersky, Jamie Kiros, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Prabhat, Ryan P. Adams |
ICML | 6 |
| 2015 | BD-CATS: big data clustering at trillion particle scaleabstractModern cosmology and plasma physics codes are now capable of simulating trillions of particles on petascale systems. Each timestep output from such simulations is on the order of 10s of TBs. Summarizing and analyzing raw particle data is challenging, and scientists often focus on density structures, whether in the real 3D space, or a high-dimensional phase space. In this work, we develop a highly scalable version of the clustering algorithm Dbscan, and apply it to the largest datasets produced by state-of-the-art codes. Our system, called Bd-Cats, is the first one capable of performing end-to-end analysis at trillion particle scale (including: loading the data, geometric partitioning, computing kd-trees, performing clustering analysis, and storing the results). We show analysis of 1.4 trillion particles from a plasma physics simulation, and a 10,2403 particle cosmological simulation, utilizing ~100,000 cores in 30 minutes. Bd-Cats is helping infer mechanisms behind particle acceleration in plasma physics and holds promise for qualitatively superior clustering in cosmology. Both of these results were previously intractable at the trillion particle scale. Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Surendra Byna, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Zarija Lukic, Vadim Roytershteyn, Michael J. Anderson, Yushu Yao, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey |
SC | 4 |
| 2015 | Full correlation matrix analysis of fMRI data on Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessorsabstractFull correlation matrix analysis (FCMA) is an unbiased approach for exhaustively studying interactions among brain regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from human participants. In order to answer neuroscientific questions efficiently, we are developing a closed-loop analysis system with FCMA on a cluster of nodes with Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors. Here we propose several ideas for data-driven algorithmic modification to improve the performance on the coprocessor. Our experiments with real datasets show that the optimized single-node code runs 5x-16x faster than the baseline implementation using the well-known Intel® MKL and LibSVM libraries, and that the cluster implementation achieves near linear speedup on 5760 cores. Yida Wang 0003, Michael J. Anderson, Jonathan D. Cohen 0003, Alexander Heinecke, Kai Li 0001, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Theodore L. Willke |
SC | 7 |
| 2015 | GraphMat: High performance graph analytics made productiveabstractGiven the growing importance of large-scale graph analytics, there is a need to improve the performance of graph analysis frameworks without compromising on productivity. GraphMat is our solution to bridge this gap between a user-friendly graph analytics framework and native, hand-optimized code. GraphMat functions by taking vertex programs and mapping them to high performance sparse matrix operations in the backend. We thus get the productivity benefits of a vertex programming framework without sacrificing performance. GraphMat is a single-node multicore graph framework written in C++ which has enabled us to write a diverse set of graph algorithms with the same effort compared to other vertex programming frameworks. GraphMat performs 1.1-7X faster than high performance frameworks such as GraphLab, CombBLAS and Galois. GraphMat also matches the performance of MapGraph, a GPU-based graph framework, despite running on a CPU platform with significantly lower compute and bandwidth resources. It achieves better multicore scalability (13-15X on 24 cores) than other frameworks and is 1.2X off native, hand-optimized code on a variety of graph algorithms. Since GraphMat performance depends mainly on a few scalable and well-understood sparse matrix operations, GraphMat can naturally benefit from the trend of increasing parallelism in future hardware. Narayanan Sundaram, Nadathur Satish, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Subramanya Dulloor, Michael J. Anderson, Satya Gautam Vadlamudi, Dipankar Das 0002, Pradeep Dubey |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2014 | Pardicle: Parallel Approximate Density-Based ClusteringabstractDBSCAN is a widely used is density-based clustering algorithm for particle data well-known for its ability to isolate arbitrarily-shaped clusters and to filter noise data. The algorithm is super-linear (O(nlogn)) and computationally expensive for large datasets. Given the need for speed, we propose a fast heuristic algorithm for DBSCAN using density based sampling, which performs equally well in quality compared to exact algorithms, but is more than an order of magnitude faster. Our experiments on astrophysics and synthetic massive datasets (8.5 billion numbers) shows that our approximate algorithm is up to 56x faster than exact algorithms with almost identical quality (Omega-Index = 0.99). We develop a new parallel DBSCAN algorithm, which uses dynamic partitioning to improve load balancing and locality. We demonstrate near-linear speedup on shared memory (15x using 16 cores, single node Intel® Xeon® processor) and distributed memory (3917x using 4096 cores, multinode) computers, with 2x additional performance improvement using Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessors. Additionally, existing exact algorithms can achieve up to 3.4 times speedup using dynamic partitioning. Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Fredrik Manne, Pradeep Dubey |
SC | 3 |
| 2014 | Navigating the maze of graph analytics frameworks using massive graph datasetsabstractGraph algorithms are becoming increasingly important for analyzing large datasets in many fields. Real-world graph data follows a pattern of sparsity, that is not uniform but highly skewed towards a few items. Implementing graph traversal, statistics and machine learning algorithms on such data in a scalable manner is quite challenging. As a result, several graph analytics frameworks (GraphLab, CombBLAS, Giraph, SociaLite and Galois among others) have been developed, each offering a solution with different programming models and targeted at different users. Unfortunately, the "Ninja performance gap" between optimized code and most of these frameworks is very large (2-30X for most frameworks and up to 560X for Giraph) for common graph algorithms, and moreover varies widely with algorithms. This makes the end-users' choice of graph framework dependent not only on ease of use but also on performance. In this work, we offer a quantitative roadmap for improving the performance of all these frameworks and bridging the "ninja gap". We first present hand-optimized baselines that get performance close to hardware limits and higher than any published performance figure for these graph algorithms. We characterize the performance of both this native implementation as well as popular graph frameworks on a variety of algorithms. This study helps end-users delineate bottlenecks arising from the algorithms themselves vs. programming model abstractions vs. the framework implementations. Further, by analyzing the system-level behavior of these frameworks, we obtain bottlenecks that are agnostic to specific algorithms. We recommend changes to alleviate these bottlenecks (and implement some of them) and reduce the performance gap with respect to native code. These changes will enable end-users to choose frameworks based mostly on ease of use. Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Jiwon Seo 0002, Jongsoo Park, Muhammad Amber Hassaan, Shubho Sengupta, Zhaoming Yin, Pradeep Dubey |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2014 | GenBase: a complex analytics genomics benchmarkabstractThis paper introduces a new benchmark designed to test database management system (DBMS) performance on a mix of data management tasks (joins, filters, etc.) and complex analytics (regression, singular value decomposition, etc.) Such mixed workloads are prevalent in a number of application areas including most science workloads and web analytics. As a specific use case, we have chosen genomics data for our benchmark and have constructed a collection of typical tasks in this domain. In addition to being representative of a mixed data management and analytics workload, this benchmark is also meant to scale to large dataset sizes and multiple nodes across a cluster. Besides presenting this benchmark, we have run it on a variety of storage systems including traditional row stores, newer column stores, Hadoop, and an array DBMS. We present performance numbers on all systems on single and multiple nodes, and show that performance differs by orders of magnitude between the various solutions. In addition, we demonstrate that most platforms have scalability issues. We also test offloading the analytics onto a coprocessor. The intent of this benchmark is to focus research interest in this area; to this end, all of our data, data generators, and scripts are available on our web site. Rebecca Taft, Manasi Vartak, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Samuel Madden 0001, Michael Stonebraker |
SIGMOD Conference | 4 |
| 2013 | Streaming Similarity Search over one Billion Tweets using Parallel Locality-Sensitive HashingabstractFinding nearest neighbors has become an important operation on databases, with applications to text search, multimedia indexing, and many other areas. One popular algorithm for similarity search, especially for high dimensional data (where spatial indexes like kd-trees do not perform well) is Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH), an approximation algorithm for finding similar objects. In this paper, we describe a new variant of LSH, called Parallel LSH (PLSH) designed to be extremely efficient, capable of scaling out on multiple nodes and multiple cores, and which supports high-throughput streaming of new data. Our approach employs several novel ideas, including: cache-conscious hash table layout, using a 2-level merge algorithm for hash table construction; an efficient algorithm for duplicate elimination during hash-table querying; an insert-optimized hash table structure and efficient data expiration algorithm for streaming data; and a performance model that accurately estimates performance of the algorithm and can be used to optimize parameter settings. We show that on a workload where we perform similarity search on a dataset of > 1 Billion tweets, with hundreds of millions of new tweets per day, we can achieve query times of 1-2.5 ms. We show that this is an order of magnitude faster than existing indexing schemes, such as inverted indexes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fastest implementation of LSH, with table construction times up to 3.7× faster and query times that are 8.3× faster than a basic implementation. Narayanan Sundaram, Aizana Turmukhametova, Nadathur Satish, Todd Mostak, Piotr Indyk, Samuel Madden 0001, Pradeep Dubey |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2010 | Dense Point Trajectories by GPU-Accelerated Large Displacement Optical Flow
Narayanan Sundaram, Thomas Brox, Kurt Keutzer |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2009 | Optimizing the use of GPU memory in applications with large data setsabstractWith general purpose programmable GPUs becoming more and more popular, automated tools are needed to bridge the gap between achievable performance from highly parallel architectures and the performance required in applications. In this paper, we concentrate on improving GPU memory management for applications with large and intermediate data sets that do not completely fit in GPU memory. For such applications, the movement of the extra data to CPU memory must be carefully managed. In particular, we focus on solving the joint task scheduling and data transfer scheduling problem posed in (N. Sundaram et al., May 2009), and propose an algorithm that gives close to optimal results (as measured by running simulated annealing overnight) in terms of the amount of data transferred for image processing benchmarks such as edge detection and convolutional neural networks. Our results enable a reduction of up to 30× in the amount of data transfers compared to an unoptimized implementation. They are up to 2× better than the methods previously proposed in (N. Sundaram et al., May 2009) and less than 16% away from the optimal solution. Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Kurt Keutzer |
HiPC | 2 |
| 2009 | Efficient, high-quality image contour detectionabstractImage contour detection is fundamental to many image analysis applications, including image segmentation, object recognition and classification. However, highly accurate image contour detection algorithms are also very computationally intensive, which limits their applicability, even for offline batch processing. In this work, we examine efficient parallel algorithms for performing image contour detection, with particular attention paid to local image analysis as well as the generalized eigensolver used in Normalized Cuts. Combining these algorithms into a contour detector, along with careful implementation on highly parallel, commodity processors from Nvidia, our contour detector provides uncompromised contour accuracy, with an F-metric of 0.70 on the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset. Runtime is reduced from 4 minutes to 1.8 seconds. The efficiency gains we realize enable high-quality image contour detection on much larger images than previously practical, and the algorithms we propose are applicable to several image segmentation approaches. Efficient, scalable, yet highly accurate image contour detection will facilitate increased performance in many computer vision applications. Bryan Catanzaro, Bor-Yiing Su, Narayanan Sundaram, Yunsup Lee, Mark Murphy, Kurt Keutzer |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2009 | A framework for efficient and scalable execution of domain-specific templates on GPUsabstractGraphics processing units (GPUs) have emerged as important players in the transition of the computing industry from sequential to multi- and many-core computing. We propose a software framework for execution of domain-specific parallel templates on GPUs, which simultaneously raises the abstraction level of GPU programming and ensures efficient execution with forward scalability to large data sizes and new GPU platforms. To achieve scalable and efficient GPU execution, our framework focuses on two critical problems that have been largely ignored in previous efforts-processing large data sets that do not fit within the GPU memory, and minimizing data transfers between the host and GPU. Our framework takes domain-specific parallel programming templates that are expressed as parallel operator graphs, and performs operator splitting, of-fload unit identification, and scheduling of off-loaded computations and data transfers between the host and the GPU, to generate a highly optimized execution plan. Finally, a code generator produces a hybrid CPU/GPU program in accordance with the derived execution plan, that uses lower-level frameworks such as CUDA. We have applied the proposed framework to templates from the recognition domain, specifically edge detection kernels and convolutional neural networks that are commonly used in image and video analysis. We present results on two different GPU platforms from NVIDIA (a Tesla C870 GPU computing card and a GeForce 8800 graphics card) that demonstrate 1.7-7.8X performance improvements over already accelerated baseline GPU implementations. We also demonstrate scalability to input data sets and application memory footprints of 6 GB and 17 GB, respectively, on GPU platforms with only 768 MB and 1.5 GB of memory. Narayanan Sundaram, Anand Raghunathan, Srimat T. Chakradhar |
IPDPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Fast support vector machine training and classification on graphics processorsabstractRecent developments in programmable, highly parallel Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) have enabled high performance implementations of machine learning algorithms. We describe a solver for Support Vector Machine training running on a GPU, using the Sequential Minimal Optimization algorithm and an adaptive first and second order working set selection heuristic, which achieves speedups of 9-35x over LIBSVM running on a traditional processor. We also present a GPU-based system for SVM classification which achieves speedups of 81-138x over LIBSVM (5-24x over our own CPU based SVM classifier). Bryan Catanzaro, Narayanan Sundaram, Kurt Keutzer |
ICML | 2 |