Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roland Billen

dblp:30/3781 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3101-8057ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Spatial and temporal data management · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial analysis
qualitative spatial reasoning
0.222010
A Reasoning System of Ternary Projective Relations · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
Modeling and Computing Ternary Projective Relations between Regions · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.112010
A Reasoning System of Ternary Projective Relations · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
Computational geometry
projective geometry
0.112006
Modeling and Computing Ternary Projective Relations between Regions · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

projective invariants · 0.2permutation rules · 0.2composition rules · 0.2geometric computation · 0.2zone partitioning · 0.1projective geometry · 0.1o(n log n) algorithms · 0.1o(n log n) algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SAMO: A Sequential Pattern Mining Model for Evaluating Road Criticality in Urban Traffic Networks
abstract
This paper proposed a Sequential pAttern Mining mOdel (SAMO) for discovering critical links and evaluating road importance in transportation systems. SAMO introduces novel criticality indices derived from association rule mining and data analysis of vehicular trajectory data. These indices are designed to assess the criticality of road links within a network by leveraging mining frequent patterns and extract meaningful associations from the trajectory data. SAMO prioritizes links that feature prominently in frequent trajectory patterns, with additional weight given to patterns with high confidence levels. We evaluated the performance of our indices within machine learning prediction models alongside with the traditional indices used in the literature. Our results demonstrate that integrating our proposed indices improves prediction accuracy across various models, with the indices consistently ranking among the top features. This indicates the promising potential of our indices for evaluating and assessing critical links in transportation networks.
Nourhan Bachir, Chamseddine Zaki, Roland Billen
VTC Fall4
2013 Errata Corrige on "Modeling and Computing Ternary Projective Relations between Regions"
abstract
We report a corrected version of the algorithms to compute ternary projective relations between regions appeared in E. Clementini and R. Billen, "Modeling and computing ternary projective relations between regions," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 799-814, 2006.
Eliseo Clementini, Roland Billen, Marco Santic
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2010 A Reasoning System of Ternary Projective Relations
abstract
This paper introduces a reasoning system based on a previously developed model for ternary projective relations between spatial objects. The model applies to spatial objects of the kind point and region is based on basic projective invariants and takes into account the size and shape of the three objects that are involved in a relation. The reasoning system proposes a set of permutation and composition rules, which allow the inference of unknown relations from given ones.
Eliseo Clementini, Spiros Skiadopoulos, Roland Billen, Francesco Tarquini
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.3
2006 Modeling and Computing Ternary Projective Relations between Regions
abstract
Current spatial database systems offer limited querying capabilities beyond binary topological relations. This paper introduces a model for projective relations between regions to support other qualitative spatial queries. The relations are ternary because they are based on the collinearity invariant of three points under projective geometry. The model is built on a partition of the plane into separate zones that are obtained from projective properties of two reference objects: then, by considering the empty/nonempty intersections of a primary object with these zones, the model is able to distinguish between 34 different projective relations. Then, the paper proposes original algorithms for computing the relations under the assumption that regions of the plane are stored as vector polygons in a spatial database. These algorithms run in optimal O(nlogn) time
Eliseo Clementini, Roland Billen
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2004 A Model for Ternary Projective Relations between Regions
Roland Billen, Eliseo Clementini
EDBT1
2004 Introducing a Reasoning System Based on Ternary Projective Relations
Roland Billen, Eliseo Clementini
SDH1