Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

André Chátelain

dblp:30/3992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Cellular and mobile networks · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.012003
Verification strategy for integration 3G baseband SoC · DAC 2003
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
system-on-chip verification
0.012003
Verification strategy for integration 3G baseband SoC · DAC 2003
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Verification strategy for integration 3G baseband SoC
abstract
The verification strategy of the second generation Motorola tri-processors baseband chip for the 3G wireless phone market is presented. The next generation of wireless phones supports multiple wireless protocols, high data bandwidth and a full range of multi-media applications running on an open OS. The baseband chip provides the integrated processing platform for such terminals. Baseband chips are among the most complex System on Chip (SoC) of this industry.The verification strategy to integrate such highly complex SoC is multi-fold and adaptive: hierarchical across the different abstraction levels with special emphasis on verification corners related to the abstraction level.The SoC architecture validation and optimization step should occur very early-on in the design cycle but require high level modeling methodology to capture the complete hardware and mission critical use cases and deliver quantitative data on the architecture. Adaptive verification scenarios are discussed across the abstraction levels and the SoC hierarchy, from stand-alone IP verification, through sub platforms and to the SoC level. A collection of metrics are presented and illustrate the efforts required to verify such complex SoC. We conclude with proposals and opportunities to enhance the SoC verification strategies based on the lessons learned.
Yves Mathys, André Chátelain
DAC2