Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaobing Sun 0002
dblp:30/4077-2
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6634-7969ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 54% Trustworthy machine learning · 42% Information extraction and text analysis · 4% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › feature learning theory
feature learning dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unraveling Feature Extraction Mechanisms in Neural Networks · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unraveling Feature Extraction Mechanisms in Neural Networks · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unraveling Feature Extraction Mechanisms in Neural Networks · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unraveling Feature Extraction Mechanisms in Neural Networks · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding Attention for Text Classification · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding Attention for Text Classification · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding Attention for Text Classification · ACL 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural tangent kernel · 0.7gradient descent analysis · 0.7gradient analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Unraveling Feature Extraction Mechanisms in Neural NetworksabstractThe underlying mechanism of neural networks in capturing precise knowledge has been the subject of consistent research efforts.In this work, we propose a theoretical approach based on Neural Tangent Kernels (NTKs) to investigate such mechanisms.Specifically, considering the infinite network width, we hypothesize the learning dynamics of target models may intuitively unravel the features they acquire from training data, deepening our insights into their internal mechanisms.We apply our approach to several fundamental models and reveal how these models leverage statistical features during gradient descent and how they are integrated into final decisions.We also discovered that the choice of activation function can affect feature extraction.For instance, the use of the ReLU activation function could potentially introduce a bias in features, providing a plausible explanation for its replacement with alternative functions in recent pre-trained language models.Additionally, we find that while self-attention and CNN models may exhibit limitations in learning n-grams, multiplication-based models seem to excel in this area.We verify these theoretical findings through experiments and find that they can be applied to analyze language modeling tasks, which can be regarded as a special variant of classification.Our contributions offer insights into the roles and capacities of fundamental components within large language models, thereby aiding the broader understanding of these complex systems. Xiaobing Sun 0002, Jiaxi Li 0001, Wei Lu 0011 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2022 | Implicit n-grams Induced by RecurrenceabstractAlthough self-attention based models such as Transformers have achieved remarkable successes on natural language processing (NLP) tasks, recent studies reveal that they have limitations on modeling sequential transformations (Hahn, 2020), which may prompt re-examinations of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that demonstrated impressive results on handling sequential data.Despite many prior attempts to interpret RNNs, their internal mechanisms have not been fully understood, and the question on how exactly they capture sequential features remains largely unclear.In this work, we present a study that shows there actually exist some explainable components that reside within the hidden states, which are reminiscent of the classical n-grams features.We evaluated such extracted explainable features from trained RNNs on downstream sentiment analysis tasks and found they could be used to model interesting linguistic phenomena such as negation and intensification.Furthermore, we examined the efficacy of using such n-gram components alone as encoders on tasks such as sentiment analysis and language modeling, revealing they could be playing important roles in contributing to the overall performance of RNNs.We hope our findings could add interpretability to RNN architectures, and also provide inspirations for proposing new architectures for sequential data. Xiaobing Sun 0002, Wei Lu 0011 |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2020 | Understanding Attention for Text ClassificationabstractAttention has been proven successful in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks.Recently, many researchers started to investigate the interpretability of attention on NLP tasks.Many existing approaches focused on examining whether the local attention weights could reflect the importance of input representations.In this work, we present a study on understanding the internal mechanism of attention by looking into the gradient update process, checking its behavior when approaching a local minimum during training.We propose to analyze for each word token the following two quantities: its polarity score and its attention score, where the latter is a global assessment on the token's significance.We discuss conditions under which the attention mechanism may become more (or less) interpretable, and show how the interplay between the two quantities may impact the model performance.1 Xiaobing Sun 0002, Wei Lu 0011 |
ACL | 1 |