Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arun Kumar 0009
dblp:30/4308-9
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 82% Geometric modeling and processing · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
motion estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Optical flow: a curve evolution approach · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1996 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Optical flow: a curve evolution approach · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1996 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation › optical flow
variational optical flow |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Optical flow: a curve evolution approach · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1996 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
active contour |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Gradient Flows and Geometric Active Contour Models · ICCV 1995 |
Geometric modeling and processing › deformable models
curve evolution |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Gradient Flows and Geometric Active Contour Models · ICCV 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
level set method · 0.0l1 minimization · 0.0curve evolution · 0.0riemannian metric · 0.0gradient flow · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Structured Relational Representations
Arun Kumar 0009, Paul Schrater |
ICAART (3) | 1 |
| 2025 | Curiosity as a Morphism of Interpretation
Arun Kumar 0009, Paul Schrater |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2019 | Belief dynamics extraction
Arun Kumar 0009, Zhengwei Wu, Xaq Pitkow, Paul Schrater |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2017 | Novelty Learning via Collaborative Proximity FilteringabstractThe vast majority of recommender systems model preferences as static or slowly changing due to observable user experience. However, spontaneous changes in user preferences are ubiquitous in many domains like media consumption and key factors that drive changes in preferences are not directly observable. These latent sources of preference change pose new challenges. When systems do not track and adapt to users' tastes, users lose confidence and trust, increasing the risk of user churn. We meet these challenges by developing a model of novelty preferences that learns and tracks latent user tastes. We combine three innovations: a new measure of item similarity based on patterns of consumption co-occurrence; model for spontaneous changes in preferences; and a learning agent that tracks each user's dynamic preferences and learns individualized policies for variety. The resulting framework adaptively provides users with novelty tailored to their preferences for change per se. Arun Kumar 0009, Paul Schrater |
IUI | 1 |
| 1997 | A Geometric Snake Model for Segmentation of Medical ImageryabstractIn this note, we employ the new geometric active contour models formulated in [25] and [26] for edge detection and segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound medical imagery. Our method is based on defining feature-based metrics on a given image which in turn leads to a novel snake paradigm in which the feature of interest may be considered to lie at the bottom of a potential well. Thus, the snake is attracted very quickly and efficiently to the desired feature. Anthony J. Yezzi, Satyanad Kichenassamy, Arun Kumar 0009, Peter J. Olver, Allen R. Tannenbaum |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 3 |
| 1996 | Optical flow: a curve evolution approachabstractA novel approach for the computation of optical flow based on an L (1) type minimization is presented. It is shown that the approach has inherent advantages since it does not smooth the flow-velocity across the edges and hence preserves edge information. A numerical approach based on computation of evolving curves is proposed for computing the optical flow field. Computations are carried out on a number of real image sequences in order to illustrate the theory as well as the numerical approach. Arun Kumar 0009, Allen R. Tannenbaum, Gary J. Balas |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 1995 | Gradient Flows and Geometric Active Contour ModelsabstractIn this paper, we analyze the geometric active contour models discussed previously from a curve evolution point of view and propose some modifications based on gradient flows relative to certain new feature-based Riemannian metrics. This leads to a novel snake paradigm in which the feature of interest may be considered to lie at the bottom of a potential well. Thus the snake is attracted very naturally and efficiently to the desired feature. Moreover, we consider some 3-D active surface models based on these ideas.> Satyanad Kichenassamy, Arun Kumar 0009, Peter J. Olver, Allen R. Tannenbaum, Anthony J. Yezzi |
ICCV | 2 |
| 1995 | Optical flow: a curve evolution approachabstractA novel approach for the computation of optical flow based on an L/sup 1/ type minimization is presented. It is shown that the approach has inherent advantages since it does not smooth the flow-velocity across the edges and hence preserves edge information. A numerical approach based on computation of evolving curves is proposed for computing the optical flow field and results of experiments are presented. Arun Kumar 0009, Allen R. Tannenbaum, Gary J. Balas |
ICIP (3) | 1 |