Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrian R. Woolfitt
dblp:30/4366
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
mass spectra classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
spectral preprocessing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.0noise thresholding · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimensabstractMOTIVATION: Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics is a breakthrough in high-throughput analyses. Early applications have focused on protein expression profiles to differentiate among various types of tissue samples (e.g. normal versus tumor). Here our goal is to use mass spectra to differentiate bacterial species using whole-organism samples. The raw spectra are similar to spectra of tissue samples, raising some of the same statistical issues (e.g. non-uniform baselines and higher noise associated with higher baseline), but are substantially noisier. As a result, new preprocessing procedures are required before these spectra can be used for statistical classification. RESULTS: In this study, we introduce novel preprocessing steps that can be used with any mass spectra. These comprise a standardization step and a denoising step. The noise level for each spectrum is determined using only data from that spectrum. Only spectral features that exceed a threshold defined by the noise level are subsequently used for classification. Using this approach, we trained the Random Forest program to classify 240 mass spectra into four bacterial types. The method resulted in zero prediction errors in the training samples and in two test datasets having 240 and 300 spectra, respectively. Glen A. Satten, Somnath Datta, Hercules Moura, Adrian R. Woolfitt, Maria da G. Carvalho, George M. Carlone, Barun K. De, Antonis Pavlopoulos, John R. Barr 0002 |
Bioinform. | 4 |