Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Russell

dblp:30/5724 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
component-based software engineering
0.011996
Components on the Internet (Panel Session) · OOPSLA 1996
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.011996
Components on the Internet (Panel Session) · OOPSLA 1996
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
client-server systems
0.011996
Components on the Internet (Panel Session) · OOPSLA 1996
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Measurement Repeatability for RF Test Within the Load-board Constraints of High Density and Fine Pitch SOC Applications
abstract
Fine pitch SOC devices with multiple RF ports force specific board technologies, which increase repeatability issues for RF measurements. This paper analyzes some of the causes of measurement repeatability issues and suggests possible solutions.
Thomas P. Warwick, Gustavo Rivera, David Waite, James Russell
ITC4
1996 Components on the Internet (Panel Session)
abstract
The explosive emergence of the Internet forces us to rethink the traditional roles for client, server, and objects. Component technology has emerged as the way objects and frameworks are packaged for flexible object integration. In particular, components allow users who are not programmers to do their own integration. Up until now, components have mainly focused on object integration on end-users desktops and on a client: compound documents, application assembly, etc.Existing component models like OpenDoc and Microsoft's OLE/OCX/COM provide function for compound documents, persistence, scripting, inking, and code management (registration). A series of Internet scenarios are emerging that demand new kinds of components. These scenarios are thin clients (Internet terminals), virtual reality/rich multimedia clients, collaboration, and business data access. Each panelist will explore one of these scenarios for it's requirements on an Internet component model.
Jeffrey Bonar, Nancy Lehrer, Kelly Looney, Stewart Nickolas, James Russell, Randy Schnier, Ted Selker
OOPSLA5