Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Desikachari Nadadur

dblp:30/6485 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.112005
A Bayesian framework for noise covariance estimation using the facet model · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005
Image and video processing
mathematical morphology
0.012000
Recursive binary dilation and erosion using digital line structuring elements in arbitrary orientations · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.012005
A Bayesian framework for noise covariance estimation using the facet model · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005
Image and video processing › mathematical morphology
morphological image processing
0.012000
Recursive binary dilation and erosion using digital line structuring elements in arbitrary orientations · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generalized inverted wishart · 0.1facet model · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1bayesian estimation · 0.1recursive two-pass algorithm · 0.0digital line structuring elements · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A Bayesian framework for noise covariance estimation using the facet model
abstract
In image processing literature, thus far, researchers have assumed the perturbation in the data to be white (or uncorrelated) having a covariance matrix sigma2I, i.e., assumption of equal variance for all the data samples and that no correlation exists between the data samples. However, there have been very few attempts to estimate noise characteristics under the assumption that there is a correlation between data samples. In this work, we propose a new and a novel approach for the simultaneous Bayesian estimation of the unknown colored or correlated noise (population) covariance matrix and the hyperparameters of the covariance model using the well-known facet model. We also estimate the facet model coefficients. We use the facet model because of its simple, yet elegant, mathematical formulation. We use the generalized inverted Wishart density as the prior model for the noise covariance matrix. We place a structure on the covariance matrix using the parameters of a correlation filter. These hyperparameters are estimated by a new extension of the expectation-maximization algorithm called the generalized constrained expectation maximization algorithm that we developed.
Desikachari Nadadur, Robert M. Haralick, David E. Gustafson
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2000 Recursive binary dilation and erosion using digital line structuring elements in arbitrary orientations
abstract
Performing morphological operations such as dilation and erosion of binary images, using very long line structuring elements is computationally expensive when performed brute-force following definitions. We present two-pass algorithms that run at constant time for obtaining binary dilations and erosions with all possible length line structuring elements, simultaneously. The algorithms run at constant time for any orientation of the line structuring element. Another contribution of this paper is the use of the concept of orientation error between a continuous line and its discrete counterpart. The orientation error is used in determining the minimum length of the basic digital line structuring element used in obtaining what we call dilation and erosion transforms. The transforms are then thresholded by the length of the desired structuring element to obtain the dilation and erosion results. The algorithms require only one maximum operation for erosion transform and only one minimum operation for dilation transform, and one thresholding step and one translation step per result pixel. We tested the algorithms on Sun Sparc Station 10, on a set of 240x250 salt and pepper noise images with probability of a pixel being a 1-pixel set to 0.25, for orientations of the normals of the structuring elements in the range [pi/2,3pi/2] and lengths, in pixels, in the range [5,145]. We achieved a speed up of about 50 (and for special orientations theta in {(pi/2), (3pi/4), pi, (5pi/4), (3pi/2)} a speed up of about 100) when the structuring elements had lengths of 145 pixels, over the brute-force methods in these experiments. We compared the results of our dilation algorithm with those of the algorithm discussed by Soille et al. (see IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol.18, p.562-67, 1996) and showed that for binary dilation (and erosion since it is just the dilation of the background with the reflected structuring element) our algorithm performed better and achieved a speed up of about four when dilation or erosion transform alone is obtained.
Desikachari Nadadur, Robert M. Haralick
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1