Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Misty D. Davies

dblp:30/8630 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-6245-9568ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program verification · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
safety verification
0.212015
Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System · FM 2015
Empirical software engineering › AI for software engineering
search-based software engineering
0.212015
GALE: Geometric Active Learning for Search-Based Software Engineering · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2015
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time embedded systems
avionics systems
0.112015
Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System · FM 2015
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms
0.112015
Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System · FM 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal verification · 0.4piecewise approximation · 0.2multi-objective evolutionary algorithm · 0.2geometric active learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Learning Mitigations for Pilot Issues When Landing Aircraft (via Multiobjective Optimization and Multiagent Simulations)
abstract
We advocate exploring complex models by combining data miners (to find a small set of most critical examples) and of multiobjective optimizers (that focus on those critical examples). An example of such a combination is the GALE optimizer that intelligently explores thousands of scenarios by examining just a few dozen of the most informative examples. GALE-style reasoning enables a very fast, very wide ranging exploration of behaviors, as well as the effects of those behaviors' limitations. This paper applies GALE to the continuous descent approach (CDA) model within the Georgia Tech Work Models that Compute framework. CDA is a model of pilot interactions: with each other and also with the navigation systems critical to safe flight. We show that, using CDA+GALE, it is possible to identify and mitigate factors that make pilots unable to complete all their required tasks in the context of different 1) function allocation strategies, 2) pilot cognitive control strategies, and 3) operational contexts that impact and safe aircraft operation. We also show that other optimization methods can be so slow to run that, without GALE, it might be impractical to find those mitigations.
Joseph Krall, Tim Menzies, Misty D. Davies
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst.3
2015 Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System
Guillaume Brat, David H. Bushnell, Misty D. Davies, Dimitra Giannakopoulou, Falk Howar, Temesghen Kahsai
FM3
2015 GALE: Geometric Active Learning for Search-Based Software Engineering
abstract
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) help software engineers find novel solutions to complex problems. When automatic tools explore too many options, they are slow to use and hard to comprehend. GALE is a near-linear time MOEA that builds a piecewise approximation to the surface of best solutions along the Pareto frontier. For each piece, GALE mutates solutions towards the better end. In numerous case studies, GALE finds comparable solutions to standard methods (NSGA-II, SPEA2) using far fewer evaluations (e.g. 20 evaluations, not 1,000). GALE is recommended when a model is expensive to evaluate, or when some audience needs to browse and understand how an MOEA has made its conclusions.
Joseph Krall, Tim Menzies, Misty D. Davies
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
2010 Automatically finding the control variables for complex system behavior
Gregory Gay 0002, Tim Menzies, Misty D. Davies, Karen Gundy-Burlet
Autom. Softw. Eng.3