Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Misty D. Davies
dblp:30/8630
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-6245-9568ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program verification · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
safety verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System · FM 2015 |
Empirical software engineering › AI for software engineering
search-based software engineering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | GALE: Geometric Active Learning for Search-Based Software Engineering · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2015 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time embedded systems
avionics systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System · FM 2015 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System · FM 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal verification · 0.4piecewise approximation · 0.2multi-objective evolutionary algorithm · 0.2geometric active learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Learning Mitigations for Pilot Issues When Landing Aircraft (via Multiobjective Optimization and Multiagent Simulations)abstractWe advocate exploring complex models by combining data miners (to find a small set of most critical examples) and of multiobjective optimizers (that focus on those critical examples). An example of such a combination is the GALE optimizer that intelligently explores thousands of scenarios by examining just a few dozen of the most informative examples. GALE-style reasoning enables a very fast, very wide ranging exploration of behaviors, as well as the effects of those behaviors' limitations. This paper applies GALE to the continuous descent approach (CDA) model within the Georgia Tech Work Models that Compute framework. CDA is a model of pilot interactions: with each other and also with the navigation systems critical to safe flight. We show that, using CDA+GALE, it is possible to identify and mitigate factors that make pilots unable to complete all their required tasks in the context of different 1) function allocation strategies, 2) pilot cognitive control strategies, and 3) operational contexts that impact and safe aircraft operation. We also show that other optimization methods can be so slow to run that, without GALE, it might be impractical to find those mitigations. Joseph Krall, Tim Menzies, Misty D. Davies |
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. | 3 |
| 2015 | Verifying the Safety of a Flight-Critical System
Guillaume Brat, David H. Bushnell, Misty D. Davies, Dimitra Giannakopoulou, Falk Howar, Temesghen Kahsai |
FM | 3 |
| 2015 | GALE: Geometric Active Learning for Search-Based Software EngineeringabstractMulti-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) help software engineers find novel solutions to complex problems. When automatic tools explore too many options, they are slow to use and hard to comprehend. GALE is a near-linear time MOEA that builds a piecewise approximation to the surface of best solutions along the Pareto frontier. For each piece, GALE mutates solutions towards the better end. In numerous case studies, GALE finds comparable solutions to standard methods (NSGA-II, SPEA2) using far fewer evaluations (e.g. 20 evaluations, not 1,000). GALE is recommended when a model is expensive to evaluate, or when some audience needs to browse and understand how an MOEA has made its conclusions. Joseph Krall, Tim Menzies, Misty D. Davies |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |
| 2010 | Automatically finding the control variables for complex system behavior
Gregory Gay 0002, Tim Menzies, Misty D. Davies, Karen Gundy-Burlet |
Autom. Softw. Eng. | 3 |