Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tomasz Odrzygózdz
dblp:300/3977
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 27% Language models and text generation · 26% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Mixture of Tokens: Continuous MoE through Cross-Example Aggregation · NeurIPS 2024 Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Experts · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › efficient language model
efficient language model architectures |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mixture of Tokens: Continuous MoE through Cross-Example Aggregation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Experts · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Experts · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fast and Precise: Adjusting Planning Horizon with Adaptive Subgoal Search · ICLR 2023 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
premise selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Provers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Provers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
best-first search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › option discovery
subgoal discovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical planning
subgoal planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Mixture of Tokens: Continuous MoE through Cross-Example Aggregation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
language model · 1.1hammers · 1.1automated theorem prover · 1.1transition tuning · 0.8scaling laws · 0.8mixture of tokens · 0.8cross-example aggregation · 0.8subgoal search · 0.7adaptive planning · 0.7best-first search · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of ExpertsabstractMixture of Experts (MoE) models have emerged as a primary solution for reducing the computational cost of Large Language Models. In this work, we analyze their scaling properties, highlighting certain arbitrary assumptions present in the existing literature. In particular, we introduce a new hyperparameter, granularity, the modification of which allows for the optimal adjustment of the size of experts. Subsequently, we present scaling laws for fine-grained MoE, taking into account the number of training tokens, model size, and granularity. Using these scaling laws, we derive the optimal training configuration for a given computational budget. Furthermore, in contrast with previous works, we demonstrate that the gap in efficiency between dense and MoE models grows as we scale up the model size and training budget. Jan Ludziejewski, Jakub Krajewski, Kamil Adamczewski, Maciej Pióro, Michal Krutul, Szymon Antoniak, Kamil Ciebiera, Krystian Król, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Piotr Sankowski, Marek Cygan, Sebastian Jaszczur |
ICML | 9 |
| 2024 | Mixture of Tokens: Continuous MoE through Cross-Example AggregationabstractMixture of Experts (MoE) models based on Transformer architecture are pushing the boundaries of language and vision tasks. The allure of these models lies in their ability to substantially increase the parameter count without a corresponding increase in FLOPs. Most widely adopted MoE models are discontinuous with respect to their parameters - often referred to as *sparse*. At the same time, existing continuous MoE designs either lag behind their sparse counterparts or are incompatible with autoregressive decoding. Motivated by the observation that the adaptation of fully continuous methods has been an overarching trend in Deep Learning, we develop Mixture of Tokens (MoT), a simple, continuous architecture that is capable of scaling the number of parameters similarly to sparse MoE models. Unlike conventional methods, MoT assigns mixtures of tokens from different examples to each expert. This architecture is fully compatible with autoregressive training and generation. Our best models not only achieve a 3x increase in training speed over dense Transformer models in language pretraining but also match the performance of state-of-the-art MoE architectures. Additionally, a close connection between MoT and MoE is demonstrated through a novel technique we call *transition tuning*. Szymon Antoniak, Michal Krutul, Maciej Pióro, Jakub Krajewski, Jan Ludziejewski, Kamil Ciebiera, Krystian Król, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Marek Cygan, Sebastian Jaszczur |
NeurIPS | 8 |
| 2023 | Fast and Precise: Adjusting Planning Horizon with Adaptive Subgoal Search
Michal Zawalski, Michal Tyrolski, Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Damian Stachura, Piotr Piekos, Yuhuai Wu, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem ProversabstractIn theorem proving, the task of selecting useful premises from a large library to unlock the proof of a given conjecture is crucially important. This presents a challenge for all theorem provers, especially the ones based on language models, due to their relative inability to reason over huge volumes of premises in text form. This paper introduces Thor, a framework integrating language models and automated theorem provers to overcome this difficulty. In Thor, a class of methods called hammers that leverage the power of automated theorem provers are used for premise selection, while all other tasks are designated to language models. Thor increases a language model's success rate on the PISA dataset from $39\%$ to $57\%$, while solving $8.2\%$ of problems neither language models nor automated theorem provers are able to solve on their own. Furthermore, with a significantly smaller computational budget, Thor can achieve a success rate on the MiniF2F dataset that is on par with the best existing methods. Thor can be instantiated for the majority of popular interactive theorem provers via a straightforward protocol we provide. Albert Q. Jiang, Szymon Tworkowski, Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Piotr Milos, Yuhuai Wu, Mateja Jamnik |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2021 | Trust, but Verify: Alleviating Pessimistic Errors in Model-Based Exploration
Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Michal Izworski, Marek Zbysinski, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 2021 | Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning TasksabstractHumans excel in solving complex reasoning tasks through a mental process of moving from one idea to a related one. Inspired by this, we propose Subgoal Search (kSubS) method. Its key component is a learned subgoal generator that produces a diversity of subgoals that are both achievable and closer to the solution. Using subgoals reduces the search space and induces a high-level search graph suitable for efficient planning. In this paper, we implement kSubS using a transformer-based subgoal module coupled with the classical best-first search framework. We show that a simple approach of generating $k$-th step ahead subgoals is surprisingly efficient on three challenging domains: two popular puzzle games, Sokoban and the Rubik's Cube, and an inequality proving benchmark INT. kSubS achieves strong results including state-of-the-art on INT within a modest computational budget. Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Marek Zbysinski, Michal Zawalski, Krzysztof Olejnik, Yuhuai Wu, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos |
NeurIPS | 2 |