Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Damian Grimling

dblp:300/4166 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
personalized classifier
0.512021
Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing · ICDM 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
personalized representation learning
0.512021
Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing · ICDM 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification › semantic classification
subjective text classification
0.512021
Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing · ICDM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multitask regression · 0.5deep learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing
abstract
Many tasks in natural language processing like offensive, toxic, or emotional text classification are subjective by nature. Humans tend to perceive textual content in their own individual way. Existing methods commonly rely on the agreed output values, the same for all consumers. Here, we propose personalized solutions to subjective tasks. Our four new deep learning models take into account not only the content but also the specificity of a given human. The models represent different approaches to learning the representation and processing data about text readers. The experiments were carried out on four datasets: Wikipedia discussion texts labelled with attack, aggression, and toxicity, as well as opinions annotated with ten numerical emotional categories. Emotional data was considered as multivariate regression (multitask), whereas Wikipedia data as independent classifications. All our models based on human biases and their representations significantly improve the prediction quality in subjective tasks evaluated from the individual’s perspective.
Jan Kocon, Marcin Gruza, Julita Bielaniewicz, Damian Grimling, Kamil Kanclerz, Piotr Milkowski, Przemyslaw Kazienko
ICDM4