Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jianxin Wei 0005
dblp:300/4310
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0448-4116ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
2.9 | 4 | 2026 | SaGD: A Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Learning Framework with Sensitivity-Aware Gradient Descent · WWW 2026 GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling · CCS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SaGD: A Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Learning Framework with Sensitivity-Aware Gradient Descent · WWW 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
node-differential privacy |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SaGD: A Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Learning Framework with Sensitivity-Aware Gradient Descent · WWW 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
edge differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
privacy-preserving graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling · CCS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling · CCS 2022 |
Data mining › probabilistic graphical models
markov random field |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Data Synthesis via Differentially Private Markov Random Field · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Data mining
probabilistic graphical models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Data Synthesis via Differentially Private Markov Random Field · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Data Synthesis via Differentially Private Markov Random Field · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensitivity analysis · 3.7gradient descent · 2.0objective perturbation · 1.7markov random field · 1.0marginal-based synthesis · 1.0stochastic gradient descent · 0.6importance sampling · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SaGD: A Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Learning Framework with Sensitivity-Aware Gradient DescentabstractLearning from graph-structured data is fundamental to many Web applications, such as recommendation systems and social network analysis. While neural networks achieve state-of-the-art performance in these tasks, training them on sensitive graph data poses privacy risks. Node-level differential privacy (node-DP) provides strong protection for individual users represented as nodes; however, achieving node-DP is challenging due to the intricate dependencies among interconnected nodes. These dependencies, in turn, complicate node-level sensitivity analysis, which is a key step in differentially private learning. To bound the sensitivity, existing approaches typically (i) rely on black-box per-sample gradient clipping, which often overestimates sensitivity and introduces an excessive amount of DP noise; and (ii) prune edges from nodes with high degrees, which leads to erroneous privacy proofs. Jianxin Wei 0005, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Ting Yu 0001 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective PerturbationabstractGraph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) are a popular machine learning model with a wide range of applications in graph analytics, including healthcare, transportation, and finance. However, a GCN trained without privacy protection measures may memorize private interpersonal relationships in the training data through its model parameters. This poses a substantial risk of compromising privacy through link attacks, potentially leading to violations of privacy regulations such as GDPR. To defend against such attacks, a promising approach is to train the GCN with differential privacy (DP), a rigorous framework that provides strong privacy protection by injecting random noise into the training process. However, training a GCN under DP is a highly challenging task. Existing solutions either perturb the graph topology or inject randomness into the graph convolution operations, or overestimate the amount of noise required, resulting in severe distortions of the network's message aggregation and, thus, poor model utility. Motivated by this, we propose GCON, a novel and effective solution for training GCNs with edge differential privacy. GCON leverages the classic idea of perturbing the objective function to satisfy DP and maintains an unaltered graph convolution process. Our rigorous theoretical analysis offers tight, closed-form bounds on the sensitivity of the graph convolution results and quantifies the impact of an edge modification on the trained model parameters. Extensive experiments using multiple benchmark datasets across diverse settings demonstrate the consistent superiority of GCON over existing solutions, as well as its resilience to link inference attacks. Jianxin Wei 0005, Yizheng Zhu, Xiaokui Xiao, Ergute Bao, Yin Yang 0001, Kuntai Cai, Beng Chin Ooi |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2022 | DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance SamplingabstractNowadays, differential privacy (DP) has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection, and deep neural networks (DNN) have been immensely successful in machine learning. The combination of these two techniques, i.e., deep learning with differential privacy, promises the privacy-preserving release of high-utility models trained with sensitive data such as medical records. A classic mechanism for this purpose is DP-SGD, which is a differentially private version of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimizer commonly used for DNN training. Subsequent approaches have improved various aspects of the model training process, including noise decay schedule, model architecture, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning. However, the core mechanism for enforcing DP in the SGD optimizer remains unchanged ever since the original DP-SGD algorithm, which has increasingly become a fundamental barrier limiting the performance of DP-compliant machine learning solutions. Jianxin Wei 0005, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin Yang 0001 |
CCS | 1 |
| 2021 | Data Synthesis via Differentially Private Markov Random FieldabstractThis paper studies the synthesis of high-dimensional datasets with differential privacy (DP). The state-of-the-art solution addresses this problem by first generating a set M of noisy low-dimensional marginals of the input data D , and then use them to approximate the data distribution in D for synthetic data generation. However, it imposes several constraints on M that considerably limits the choices of marginals. This makes it difficult to capture all important correlations among attributes, which in turn degrades the quality of the resulting synthetic data. To address the above deficiency, we propose PrivMRF, a method that (i) also utilizes a set M of low-dimensional marginals for synthesizing high-dimensional data with DP, but (ii) provides a high degree of flexibility in the choices of marginals. The key idea of PrivMRF is to select an appropriate M to construct a Markov random field (MRF) that models the correlations among the attributes in the input data, and then use the MRF for data synthesis. Experimental results on four benchmark datasets show that PrivMRF consistently outperforms the state of the art in terms of the accuracy of counting queries and classification tasks conducted on the synthetic data generated. Kuntai Cai, Xiaoyu Lei, Jianxin Wei 0005, Xiaokui Xiao |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |