Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Sklar
dblp:300/4403
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 70% Reinforcement learning · 30% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot coordination
heterogeneous robot team coordination |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous Policy Networks for Composite Robot Team Communication and Coordination · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › emergent communication
learned communication |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous Policy Networks for Composite Robot Team Communication and Coordination · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
multi-agent communication |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous Policy Networks for Composite Robot Team Communication and Coordination · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous Policy Networks for Composite Robot Team Communication and Coordination · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous Policy Networks for Composite Robot Team Communication and Coordination · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
heterogeneous graph attention network · 0.8binarized messaging · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Heterogeneous Policy Networks for Composite Robot Team Communication and CoordinationabstractHigh-performing human–human teams learn intelligent and efficient communication and coordination strategies to maximize their joint utility. These teams implicitly understand the different roles of heterogeneous team members and adapt their communication protocols accordingly. Multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL) has attempted to develop computational methods for synthesizing such joint coordination–communication strategies, but emulating heterogeneous communication patterns across agents with different state, action, and observation spaces has remained a challenge. Without properly modeling agent heterogeneity, as in prior MARL work that leverages homogeneous graph networks, communication becomes less helpful and can even deteriorate the team's performance. In the past, we proposed heterogeneous policy networks (HetNet) to learn efficient and diverse communication models for coordinating cooperative heterogeneous teams. In this extended work, we extend HetNet to support scaling heterogeneous robot teams. Building on heterogeneous graph-attention networks, we show that HetNet not only facilitates learning heterogeneous collaborative policies, but also enables end-to-end training for learning highly efficient binarized messaging. Our empirical evaluation shows that HetNet sets a new state-of-the-art in learning coordination and communication strategies for heterogeneous multiagent teams by achieving an 5.84% to 707.65% performance improvement over the next-best baseline across multiple domains while simultaneously achieving a 200× reduction in the required communication bandwidth. Esmaeil Seraj, Rohan R. Paleja, Luis Pimentel, Kin Man Lee, Zheyuan Wang, Matthew Sklar, John Z. Zhang, Zahi M. Kakish, Matthew C. Gombolay |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 7 |