EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jannik Irmai
dblp:300/8374
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6097-1867ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 48% Quantum computing and quantum information · 35% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | A Sub-Problem Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Correlation Clustering · ICML 2025 Box Facets and Cut Facets of Lifted Multicut Polytopes · ICML 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
correlation clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Sub-Problem Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Correlation Clustering · ICML 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Sub-Problem Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Correlation Clustering · ICML 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum approximate optimization algorithm |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Sub-Problem Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Correlation Clustering · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
polyhedral combinatorics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Box Facets and Cut Facets of Lifted Multicut Polytopes · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
problem decomposition · 0.9nucleus sampling · 0.9linear programming · 0.8NP-hardness proof · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Sub-Problem Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Correlation ClusteringabstractThe Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm for approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Although it has been successfully applied to a variety of problems, there is only limited work on correlation clustering due to the difficulty of modelling the problem constraints with the ansatz. Motivated by this, we present a generalization of QAOA that is more suitable for this problem. In particular, we modify QAOA in two ways: Firstly, we use nucleus sampling for the computation of the expected cost. Secondly, we split the problem into sub-problems, solving each individually with QAOA. We call this generalization the Sub-Problem Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (SQAOA) and show theoretically that optimal solutions for correlation clustering instances can be obtained with certainty when the depth of the ansatz tends to infinity. Further, we show experimentally that SQAOA achieves better approximation ratios than QAOA for correlation clustering, while using only one qubit per node of the respective problem instance and reducing the runtime (of simulations). Lucas Fabian Naumann, Jannik Irmai, Bjoern Andres |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | A 4-Approximation Algorithm for Min Max Correlation Clustering
Holger S. G. Heidrich, Jannik Irmai, Bjoern Andres |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | Box Facets and Cut Facets of Lifted Multicut PolytopesabstractThe lifted multicut problem has diverse applications in the field of computer vision. Exact algorithms based on linear programming require an understanding of lifted multicut polytopes. Despite recent progress, two fundamental questions about these polytopes have remained open: Which lower box inequalities define facets, and which cut inequalities define facets? In this article, we answer the first question by establishing conditions that are necessary, sufficient and efficiently decidable. Toward the second question, we show that deciding facet-definingness of cut inequalities is NP-hard. This completes the analysis of canonical facets of lifted multicut polytopes. Lucas Fabian Naumann, Jannik Irmai, Shengxian Zhao, Bjoern Andres |
ICML | 2 |