Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Omkar Phadke

dblp:300/8841 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5606-6242ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 61% Integrated circuit design · 30% Performance modeling and evaluation · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
cache
1.012026
Optimization and Benchmarking of Monolithically Stackable Gain Cell Memory for Last-Level Cache · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Memory systems › memory hierarchy › cache hierarchy
last-level cache
1.012026
Optimization and Benchmarking of Monolithically Stackable Gain Cell Memory for Last-Level Cache · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026
Integrated circuit design › 3d integration
monolithic 3d integration
1.012026
Optimization and Benchmarking of Monolithically Stackable Gain Cell Memory for Last-Level Cache · IEEE Trans. Computers 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gem5 simulation · 1.0NS-Cache modeling · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimization and Benchmarking of Monolithically Stackable Gain Cell Memory for Last-Level Cache
abstract
The Last Level Cache (LLC) is the processor’s critical bridge between on-chip and off-chip memory levels - optimized for high density, high bandwidth, and low operation energy. To date, high-density (HD) SRAM has been the conventional device of choice; however, with the slowing of transistor scaling, as reflected in the industry’s almost identical HD SRAM cell size from 5 nm to 3 nm, alternative solutions such as 3D stacking with advanced packaging (i.e., hybrid bonding) are pursued (as demonstrated in AMD’s V-cache). Escalating data demands necessitate ultra-large on-chip caches to decrease costly off-chip memory movement, pushing the exploration of device technology towards monolithic 3D (M3D) integration, where transistors can be stacked in the back-end-of-line (BEOL) at the interconnect level. M3D integration requires fabrication techniques compatible with a low thermal budget (seconds) when used in a gain-cell configuration. This paper examines device, circuit, and system-level tradeoffs made when optimizing BEOL-compatible AOS-based 2-transistor gain cells (2T-GC) for LLC. A cache early-exploration tool, NS-Cache, is developed to model caches in advanced 7 & 3 nm nodes and is integrated with the Gem5 simulator to systematically benchmark the impact of the newfound density/performance when compared to HD-SRAM, MRAM, and 1T1C eDRAM alternatives for LLC.
Faaiq G. Waqar, Jungyoun Kwak, Omkar Phadke, Minji Shon, MohammadHosein Gholamrezaei, Kevin Skadron, Shimeng Yu
IEEE Trans. Computers4