Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Francesco Landolfi

dblp:300/9636 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5674-0663ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 64% Graph learning · 28% 3D vision · 8%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 65% Mathematical optimization · 35%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.812024
Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic Orientations · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning
0.812024
Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic Orientations · ICLR 2024
Graph algorithms and graph theory › directed graph
acyclic orientation
0.812024
Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic Orientations · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.812024
Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic Orientations · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph pooling
0.712023
Generalizing Downsampling from Regular Data to Graphs · AAAI 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph simplification
graph coarsening
0.712023
Generalizing Downsampling from Regular Data to Graphs · AAAI 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation
multi-resolution representation
0.212023
Generalizing Downsampling from Regular Data to Graphs · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

differentiable approximation · 1.5continuous relaxation · 1.5greedy algorithm · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generalized Stochastic Pooling
abstract
Pooling layers play a critical role in Convolutional Neural Networks by reducing spatial dimensions and enhancing translation invariance.While conventional methods like max pooling and average pooling are effective, they can respectively amplify noise or dilute important features.Stochastic pooling introduces probabilistic sampling to improve generalization but is susceptible to biases from outliers, often mimicking max pooling in such cases.To address these limitations, we propose a generalization of stochastic pooling that introduces a tunable parameter to control the balance between uniform sampling, stochastic pooling, and max pooling.Experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that uniform sampling outperforms the biased one, achieving a favorable trade-off between regularization and performance.
Francesco Landolfi, Davide Bacciu
ESANN1
2024 Generalizing Convolution to Point Clouds
abstract
Convolution, a fundamental operation in deep learning for structured grid data like images, cannot be directly applied to point clouds due to their irregular and unordered nature.Many approaches in literature that perform convolution on point clouds achieve this by designing a convolutional operator from scratch, often with little resemblance to the one used on images.We present two point cloud convolutions that naturally follow from the convolution in its standard definition popular with images.We do so by relaxing the indexing of the kernel weights with a "soft" dictionary that resembles the attention mechanism of the transformers.Finally, experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed relaxations on two benchmark point cloud classification tasks. Generalizing Convolution to Point CloudsGiven the tensors
Davide Bacciu, Francesco Landolfi
ESANN2
2024 Constraint-Free Structure Learning with Smooth Acyclic Orientations
abstract
The structure learning problem consists of fitting data generated by a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to correctly reconstruct its arcs. In this context, differentiable approaches constrain or regularize an optimization problem with a continuous relaxation of the acyclicity property. The computational cost of evaluating graph acyclicity is cubic on the number of nodes and significantly affects scalability. In this paper, we introduce COSMO, a constraint-free continuous optimization scheme for acyclic structure learning. At the core of our method lies a novel differentiable approximation of an orientation matrix parameterized by a single priority vector. Differently from previous works, our parameterization fits a smooth orientation matrix and the resulting acyclic adjacency matrix without evaluating acyclicity at any step. Despite this absence, we prove that COSMO always converges to an acyclic solution. In addition to being asymptotically faster, our empirical analysis highlights how COSMO performance on graph reconstruction compares favorably with competing structure learning methods.
Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Landolfi, Martina Cinquini, Davide Bacciu
ICLR2
2023 Generalizing Downsampling from Regular Data to Graphs
abstract
Downsampling produces coarsened, multi-resolution representations of data and it is used, for example, to produce lossy compression and visualization of large images, reduce computational costs, and boost deep neural representation learning. Unfortunately, due to their lack of a regular structure, there is still no consensus on how downsampling should apply to graphs and linked data. Indeed reductions in graph data are still needed for the goals described above, but reduction mechanisms do not have the same focus on preserving topological structures and properties, while allowing for resolution-tuning, as is the case in regular data downsampling. In this paper, we take a step in this direction, introducing a unifying interpretation of downsampling in regular and graph data. In particular, we define a graph coarsening mechanism which is a graph-structured counterpart of controllable equispaced coarsening mechanisms in regular data. We prove theoretical guarantees for distortion bounds on path lengths, as well as the ability to preserve key topological properties in the coarsened graphs. We leverage these concepts to define a graph pooling mechanism that we empirically assess in graph classification tasks, providing a greedy algorithm that allows efficient parallel implementation on GPUs, and showing that it compares favorably against pooling methods in literature.
Davide Bacciu, Alessio Conte, Francesco Landolfi
AAAI3
2023 A Tropical View of Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Learning dynamic programming algorithms with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is a research direction which is increasingly gaining popularity.Prior work has demonstrated that in order to learn such algorithms, it is necessary to have an "alignment" between the neural architecture and the dynamics of the target algorithms, and that GNNs align, in fact, with dynamic programming.Here, we provide a different view of this alignment, studying it through the lens of tropical algebra.We show that GNNs can approximate dynamic programming algorithms up to arbitrary precision, provided that their input and output are appropriately pre-and post-processed.
Francesco Landolfi, Davide Bacciu, Danilo Numeroso
ESANN1
2022 Revisiting Edge Pooling in Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Sparse pooling methods for graph neural networks typically perform graph reduction by keeping only the top-k vertices according to an adaptive scoring function.Although fast and scalable, these methods destroy the relational information of the graph and possibly make it disconnected.EdgePool is one of the few sparse alternatives that preserve the connectivity of the input graph by performing a series of edge contractions according to an adaptive scoring of the edges, but it has the drawback of being sequential and not scalable on large scale graphs.In this paper we show that EdgePool can be efficiently computed adapting a well-known parallel algorithm from literature, and we also propose a novel, parallel alternative that leverages on an adaptive scoring function of the nodes.We test both methods on standard benchmark datasets, showing that they generally outperform other sparse pooling methods from the literature. * I would like to thank Davide Bacciu and Alessio Conte
Francesco Landolfi
ESANN1
2021 K-plex cover pooling for graph neural networks
abstract
Abstract Graph pooling methods provide mechanisms for structure reduction that are intended to ease the diffusion of context between nodes further in the graph, and that typically leverage community discovery mechanisms or node and edge pruning heuristics. In this paper, we introduce a novel pooling technique which borrows from classical results in graph theory that is non-parametric and generalizes well to graphs of different nature and connectivity patterns. Our pooling method, namedKPlexPool, builds on the concepts of graph covers andk-plexes, i.e. pseudo-cliques where each node can miss up toklinks. The experimental evaluation on benchmarks on molecular and social graph classification shows thatKPlexPoolachieves state of the art performances against both parametric and non-parametric pooling methods in the literature, despite generating pooled graphs based solely on topological information.
Davide Bacciu, Alessio Conte, Roberto Grossi, Francesco Landolfi, Andrea Marino 0001
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.4