Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien Weibel

dblp:300/9961 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-7597-440XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
consensus
0.812024
Brief Announcement: Randomized Consensus: Common Coins Are not the Holy Grail! · PODC 2024
Distributed systems › consensus › fault-tolerant consensus
randomized consensus
0.812024
Brief Announcement: Randomized Consensus: Common Coins Are not the Holy Grail! · PODC 2024
Information theory
common randomness
0.812024
Brief Announcement: Randomized Consensus: Common Coins Are not the Holy Grail! · PODC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

round complexity analysis · 1.5randomized algorithm · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Brief Announcement: Randomized Consensus: Common Coins Are not the Holy Grail!
abstract
This paper studies the round complexity of randomized binary consensus in crash-prone asynchronous distributed systems. While the Consensus problem cannot be solved deterministically, Ben-Or and Rabin showed that randomization allows solving the problem with probability 1. Moreover, while local coins may need an exponential number of rounds in n, a common coin that delivers the same random sequence to all processes allows termination within a constant mean number of rounds. This paper studies the round complexity and the optimality for different coins. Surprisingly, while the common coin is optimal when t > n/3, it is not when t ≤ n/3.
Achour Mostéfaoui, Matthieu Perrin, Julien Weibel
PODC3