EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Uchswas Paul
dblp:301/4876
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-6785-7242ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Configuration Defects in Kubernetes · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration management |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Configuration Defects in Kubernetes · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static analysis · 1.0qualitative analysis · 1.0linter development · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Configuration Defects in KubernetesabstractKubernetes is a tool that facilitates rapid deployment of software. Unfortunately, configuring Kubernetes is prone to errors. Configuration defects are not uncommon and can result in serious consequences. This paper reports an empirical study about configuration defects in Kubernetes with the goal of helping practitioners detect and prevent these defects. We study 719 defects that we extract from 2,260 Kubernetes configuration scripts using open source repositories. Using qualitative analysis, we identify 15 categories of defects, of which 7 have not been reported in previously-studied software systems. We find 8 publicly available static analysis tools to be capable of detecting 8 of the 15 defect categories. We find that the highest precision and recall of those tools are for defects related to data fields. We develop a linter to detect two categories of defects that cause serious consequences, which none of the studied tools are able to detect. Our linter revealed 26 previously-unknown defects that have been confirmed by practitioners, 19 of which have already been fixed. We conclude our paper by providing recommendations on how defect detection and repair techniques can be used for Kubernetes configuration scripts. The datasets and source code used for the paper are publicly available online. Yue Zhang 0051, Uchswas Paul, Marcelo d'Amorim, Akond Ashfaque Ur Rahman |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |