Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel A. Nissley

dblp:301/4894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0550-9394ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 94% Computational science and engineering · 6%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
1.322024
ABodyBuilder3: improved and scalable antibody structure predictions · Bioinform. 2024
Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
antibody structure prediction
0.812024
ABodyBuilder3: improved and scalable antibody structure predictions · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein dynamics
protein folding pathways
0.612022
Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein folding
0.512021
Ribosome occupancy profiles are conserved between structurally and evolutionarily related yeast domains · Bioinform. 2021
Computational science and engineering › statistical computing
uncertainty estimation
0.212024
ABodyBuilder3: improved and scalable antibody structure predictions · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relaxation strategies · 0.8language model embeddings · 0.8molecular dynamics simulation · 0.6deep learning · 0.6ribosome profiling · 0.5comparative sequence analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ABodyBuilder3: improved and scalable antibody structure predictions
abstract
SUMMARY: In this article, we introduce ABodyBuilder3, an improved and scalable antibody structure prediction model based on ABodyBuilder2. We achieve a new state-of-the-art accuracy in the modelling of CDR loops by leveraging language model embeddings, and show how predicted structures can be further improved through careful relaxation strategies. Finally, we incorporate a predicted Local Distance Difference Test into the model output to allow for a more accurate estimation of uncertainties. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software package is available at https://github.com/Exscientia/ABodyBuilder3 with model weights and data at https://zenodo.org/records/11354577.
Henry Kenlay, Frédéric A. Dreyer, Daniel Cutting, Daniel A. Nissley, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.4
2022 Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding
abstract
SUMMARY: Motivation. Predicting the native state of a protein has long been considered a gateway problem for understanding protein folding. Recent advances in structural modeling driven by deep learning have achieved unprecedented success at predicting a protein's crystal structure, but it is not clear if these models are learning the physics of how proteins dynamically fold into their equilibrium structure or are just accurate knowledge-based predictors of the final state. Results. In this work, we compare the pathways generated by state-of-the-art protein structure prediction methods to experimental data about protein folding pathways. The methods considered were AlphaFold 2, RoseTTAFold, trRosetta, RaptorX, DMPfold, EVfold, SAINT2 and Rosetta. We find evidence that their simulated dynamics capture some information about the folding pathway, but their predictive ability is worse than a trivial classifier using sequence-agnostic features like chain length. The folding trajectories produced are also uncorrelated with experimental observables such as intermediate structures and the folding rate constant. These results suggest that recent advances in structure prediction do not yet provide an enhanced understanding of protein folding. Availability. The data underlying this article are available in GitHub at https://github.com/oxpig/structure-vs-folding/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Carlos Outeiral, Daniel A. Nissley, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.2
2021 Ribosome occupancy profiles are conserved between structurally and evolutionarily related yeast domains
abstract
MOTIVATION: Protein synthesis is a non-equilibrium process, meaning that the speed of translation can influence the ability of proteins to fold and function. Assuming that structurally similar proteins fold by similar pathways, the profile of translation speed along an mRNA should be evolutionarily conserved between related proteins to direct correct folding and downstream function. The only evidence to date for such conservation of translation speed between homologous proteins has used codon rarity as a proxy for translation speed. There are, however, many other factors including mRNA structure and the chemistry of the amino acids in the A- and P-sites of the ribosome that influence the speed of amino acid addition. RESULTS: Ribosome profiling experiments provide a signal directly proportional to the underlying translation times at the level of individual codons. We compared ribosome occupancy profiles (extracted from five different large-scale yeast ribosome profiling studies) between related protein domains to more directly test if their translation schedule was conserved. Our analysis reveals that the ribosome occupancy profiles of paralogous domains tend to be significantly more similar to one another than to profiles of non-paralogous domains. This trend does not depend on domain length, structural classes, amino acid composition or sequence similarity. Our results indicate that entire ribosome occupancy profiles and not just rare codon locations are conserved between even distantly related domains in yeast, providing support for the hypothesis that translation schedule is conserved between structurally related domains to retain folding pathways and facilitate efficient folding. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Python3 code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/DanNissley/Compare-ribosome-occupancy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Daniel A. Nissley, Anna Carbery, Mark Chonofsky, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.1