Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akshaye Shenoi
dblp:301/5862
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet architecture and protocols · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols
peering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the Routing-Aware Peering against Network-Eclipse Attacks in Bitcoin · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
Internet architecture and protocols › overlay networks
peer-to-peer routing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the Routing-Aware Peering against Network-Eclipse Attacks in Bitcoin · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain network security
bitcoin network attacks |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the Routing-Aware Peering against Network-Eclipse Attacks in Bitcoin · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
routing-aware peering · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | iPET: Privacy Enhancing Traffic Perturbations for Secure IoT CommunicationsabstractIoT devices constantly communicate with servers over the Internet, allowing an attacker to extract sensitive information by passively monitoring the network traffic. Recent research works have shown that a network attacker with a trained machine learning (ML) model can accurately fingerprint IoT devices learned from the (encrypted) traffic flows of the devices. Such fingerprinting attacks are capable of revealing the make and model of the devices, which can further be used to extract detailed user activities. In this work, we develop and propose iPET, a novel adversarial perturbation-based traffic modification system that defends against fingerprinting attacks. iPET design employs GAN (Generative Adversarial Networks) in a tuneable way, allowing users to specify the maximum bandwidth overhead they are willing to tolerate for the defense. A fundamental idea of iPET is to deliberately introduce stochasticity between model instances. This approach limits a counter attack, as it inhibits an attacker from recreating an identical perturbation model and using it for fingerprinting. We evaluate the effectiveness of our defense against state-of-the-art fingerprinting models and with three different attacker capabilities. Our evaluations on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that iPET decreases the accuracy of even the potent attackers. We also show that the traffic perturbations generated by iPET generalize well to different fingerprinting schemes that an attacker may deploy. Akshaye Shenoi, Prasanna Karthik Vairam, Kanav Sabharwal, Dinil Mon Divakaran |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 1 |
| 2021 | On the Routing-Aware Peering against Network-Eclipse Attacks in Bitcoin
Muoi Tran, Akshaye Shenoi, Min Suk Kang |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |