Mohamed Saleh Abouelyazid

dblp:301/7387 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1183-2593ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › parasitic extraction
capacitance extraction
0.612022
Accuracy-Based Hybrid Parasitic Capacitance Extraction Using Rule-Based, Neural-Networks, and Field-Solver Methods · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Electronic design automation › physical design
parasitic extraction
0.612022
Accuracy-Based Hybrid Parasitic Capacitance Extraction Using Rule-Based, Neural-Networks, and Field-Solver Methods · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based extraction · 0.6field solver · 0.6density-map representation · 0.6deep neural network · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Fast and Accurate Middle End of Line Parasitic Capacitance Extraction for MOSFET and FinFET Technologies Using Machine Learning
abstract
A novel machine learning modeling methodology for parasitic capacitance extraction of middle-end-of-line metal layers around FinFETs and MOSFETs is developed. Due to the increasing complexity and parasitic extraction accuracy requirements of middle-end-of-line patterns in advanced process nodes, most of the current parasitic extraction tools rely on field-solvers to extract middle-end-of-line parasitic capacitances. As a result, a lot of time, memory, and computational resources are consumed. The proposed modeling methodology overcomes these problems by providing compact models that predict middle-end-of-line parasitic capacitances efficiently. The compact models are pre-characterized and technology-dependent. Also, they can handle the increasing accuracy requirements in advanced process nodes. The proposed methodology scans layouts for devices, extracts geometrical features of each device using a novel geometry-based pattern representation, and uses the extracted features as inputs to the required machine learning models. Two machine learning methods are used including: support vector regressions and neural networks. The testing covered more than 40M devices in several different real designs that belong to 28nm and 7nm process technology nodes. The proposed methodology managed to provide outstanding results as compared to field-solvers with an average error < 0.2%, a standard deviation < 3%, and a speed up of 100X.
Mohamed Saleh Abouelyazid, Sherif Hammouda, Yehea I. Ismail
ASP-DAC1
2022 Accuracy-Based Hybrid Parasitic Capacitance Extraction Using Rule-Based, Neural-Networks, and Field-Solver Methods
abstract
As process technologies scale down, the accuracy requirements of parasitic capacitance extractions for integrated circuits significantly increase. This work introduces a novel accuracy-based hybrid parasitic capacitance extraction flow, where the chip is subdivided into windows, and each window’s capacitances are calculated using one of three extraction methods: field-solver, rule-based, and novel deep-neural-networks-based methods. This hybrid methodology uses a density-map feature representation as an input to neural-networks classifiers to determine an extraction method for each window. As an intermediate method between rule-based and field-solver methods, a novel deep-neural-networks-based extraction method is introduced. This intermediate level of accuracy and speed is needed since using only rule-based and field-solver methods results in using the field-solver most of the time for any required high accuracy extraction. This method uses a novel hybrid density-voltage representation as an input to improve its accuracy and speed. The proposed hybrid flow identifies the accuracy limits of the three extraction methods and directs each window to the fastest method that meets the user predetermined accuracy level. The proposed flow is tested on different real designs and showed outstanding accuracy and runtime as compared to commercial field-solver and rule-based tools. The results show that the proposed deep-neural-networks extraction method extracts capacitances of complicated structures with high accuracy ($100\times $faster than field-solvers. However, few outliers have an error exceeding 5% in extracted capacitances. Furthermore, the proposed hybrid flow managed to meet the required accuracy ($70\times $faster than field-solvers.
Mohamed Saleh Abouelyazid, Sherif Hammouda, Yehea I. Ismail
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1