OBJECTIVE: Severe infection can lead to organ dysfunction and sepsis. Identifying subphenotypes of infected patients is essential for personalized management. It is unknown how different time series clustering algorithms compare in identifying these subphenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected infection admitted between 2014 and 2019 to 4 hospitals in Emory healthcare were included, split into separate training and validation cohorts. Dynamic time warping (DTW) was applied to vital signs from the first 8 h of hospitalization, and hierarchical clustering (DTW-HC) and partition around medoids (DTW-PAM) were used to cluster patients into subphenotypes. DTW-HC, DTW-PAM, and a previously published group-based trajectory model (GBTM) were evaluated for agreement in subphenotype clusters, trajectory patterns, and subphenotype associations with clinical outcomes and treatment responses. RESULTS: There were 12 473 patients in training and 8256 patients in validation cohorts. DTW-HC, DTW-PAM, and GBTM models resulted in 4 consistent vitals trajectory patterns with significant agreement in clustering (71-80% agreement, P < .001): group A was hyperthermic, tachycardic, tachypneic, and hypotensive. Group B was hyperthermic, tachycardic, tachypneic, and hypertensive. Groups C and D had lower temperatures, heart rates, and respiratory rates, with group C normotensive and group D hypotensive. Group A had higher odds ratio of 30-day inpatient mortality (P < .01) and group D had significant mortality benefit from balanced crystalloids compared to saline (P < .01) in all 3 models. DISCUSSION: DTW- and GBTM-based clustering algorithms applied to vital signs in infected patients identified consistent subphenotypes with distinct clinical outcomes and treatment responses. CONCLUSION: Time series clustering with distinct computational approaches demonstrate similar performance and significant agreement in the resulting subphenotypes.

OBJECTIVES: Early identification of infection improves outcomes, but developing models for early identification requires determining infection status with manual chart review, limiting sample size. Therefore, we aimed to compare semi-supervised and transfer learning algorithms with algorithms based solely on manual chart review for identifying infection in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study of admissions to 6 hospitals included "gold-standard" labels of infection from manual chart review and "silver-standard" labels from nonchart-reviewed patients using the Sepsis-3 infection criteria based on antibiotic and culture orders. "Gold-standard" labeled admissions were randomly allocated to training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Using patient characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory data from the first 24 hours of admission, we derived deep learning and non-deep learning models using transfer learning and semi-supervised methods. Performance was compared in the gold-standard test set using discrimination and calibration metrics. RESULTS: The study comprised 432 965 admissions, of which 2724 underwent chart review. In the test set, deep learning and non-deep learning approaches had similar discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82). Semi-supervised and transfer learning approaches did not improve discrimination over models fit using only silver- or gold-standard data. Transfer learning had the best calibration (unreliability index P value: .997, Brier score: 0.173), followed by self-learning gradient boosted machine (P value: .67, Brier score: 0.170). DISCUSSION: Deep learning and non-deep learning models performed similarly for identifying infection, as did models developed using Sepsis-3 and manual chart review labels. CONCLUSION: In a multicenter study of almost 3000 chart-reviewed patients, semi-supervised and transfer learning models showed similar performance for model discrimination as baseline XGBoost, while transfer learning improved calibration.

Tensor factorization has been proved as an efficient unsupervised learning approach for health data analysis, especially for computational phenotyping, where the high-dimensional Electronic Health Records (EHRs) with patients history of medical procedures, medications, diagnosis, lab tests, etc., are converted to meaningful and interpretable medical concepts. Federated tensor factorization distributes the tensor computation to multiple workers under the coordination of a central server, which enables jointly learning the phenotypes across multiple hospitals while preserving the privacy of the patient information. However, existing federated tensor factorization algorithms encounter the single-point-failure issue with the involvement of the central server, which is not only easily exposed to external attacks, but also limits the number of clients sharing information with the server under restricted uplink bandwidth. In this paper, we propose CiderTF, a communication-efficient decentralized generalized tensor factorization, which reduces the uplink communication cost by leveraging a four-level communication reduction strategy designed for a generalized tensor factorization, which has the flexibility of modeling different tensor distribution with multiple kinds of loss functions. Experiments on two real-world EHR datasets demonstrate that CiderTF achieves comparable convergence with the communication reduction up to 99.99%.