Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haode Zhang
dblp:301/9207
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 31% Reinforcement learning · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Robust Reward Alignment via Hypothesis Space Batch Cutting · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Robust Reward Alignment via Hypothesis Space Batch Cutting · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | New Intent Discovery with Pre-training and Contrastive Learning · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dialogue analysis
intent discovery |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | New Intent Discovery with Pre-training and Contrastive Learning · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dialogue analysis › intent discovery
new intent discovery |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | New Intent Discovery with Pre-training and Contrastive Learning · ACL (1) 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Robust Reward Alignment via Hypothesis Space Batch Cutting · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
voting function · 0.9hypothesis space cutting · 0.9disagreement-based querying · 0.9pseudo-labeling · 0.6pre-training · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6clustering · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Robust Reward Alignment via Hypothesis Space Batch CuttingabstractReward design in reinforcement learning and optimal control is challenging. Preference-based alignment addresses this by enabling agents to learn rewards from ranked trajectory pairs provided by humans. However, existing methods often struggle from poor robustness to unknown false human preferences. In this work, we propose a robust and efficient reward alignment method based on a novel and geometrically interpretable perspective: hypothesis space batched cutting. Our method iteratively refines the reward hypothesis space through “cuts” based on batches of human preferences. Within each batch, human preferences, queried based on disagreement, are grouped using a voting function to determine the appropriate cut, ensuring a bounded human query complexity. To handle unknown erroneous preferences, we introduce a conservative cutting method within each batch, preventing erroneous human preferences from making overly aggressive cuts to the hypothesis space. This guarantees provable robustness against false preferences, while eliminating the need to explicitly identify them. We evaluate our method in a model predictive control setting across diverse tasks. The results demonstrate that our framework achieves comparable or superior performance to state-of-the-art methods in error-free settings while significantly outperforming existing methods when handling a high percentage of erroneous human preferences. Zhixian Xie, Haode Zhang, Yizhe Feng, Wanxin Jin |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | New Intent Discovery with Pre-training and Contrastive LearningabstractNew intent discovery aims to uncover novel intent categories from user utterances to expand the set of supported intent classes.It is a critical task for the development and service expansion of a practical dialogue system.Despite its importance, this problem remains under-explored in the literature.Existing approaches typically rely on a large amount of labeled utterances and employ pseudo-labeling methods for representation learning and clustering, which are label-intensive, inefficient, and inaccurate.In this paper, we provide new solutions to two important research questions for new intent discovery: (1) how to learn semantic utterance representations and (2) how to better cluster utterances.Particularly, we first propose a multi-task pre-training strategy to leverage rich unlabeled data along with external labeled data for representation learning.Then, we design a new contrastive loss to exploit self-supervisory signals in unlabeled data for clustering.Extensive experiments on three intent recognition benchmarks demonstrate the high effectiveness of our proposed method, which outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin in both unsupervised and semi-supervised scenarios.The source code will be available at https://github. com/ Yuwei Zhang 0001, Haode Zhang, Li-Ming Zhan, Xiao-Ming Wu 0003, Albert Y. S. Lam |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2022 | Fine-tuning Pre-trained Language Models for Few-shot Intent Detection: Supervised Pre-training and IsotropizationabstractHaode Zhang, Haowen Liang, Yuwei Zhang, Li-Ming Zhan, Xiao-Ming Wu, Xiaolei Lu, Albert Lam. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Haode Zhang, Haowen Liang, Yuwei Zhang 0001, Li-Ming Zhan, Xiao-Ming Wu 0003, Xiaolei Lu, Albert Y. S. Lam |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |