Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Eran Hirsch

dblp:302/4300 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Language models and text generation · 41% Generative modeling · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.522025
Make It Count: Text-to-Image Generation with an Accurate Number of Objects · CVPR 2025
Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
1.522025
Make It Count: Text-to-Image Generation with an Accurate Number of Objects · CVPR 2025
Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › hallucination detection
factual inconsistency detection
1.012026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
hallucination
1.012026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference
1.012026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods
0.912025
LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
room layout estimation
0.912025
Make It Count: Text-to-Image Generation with an Accurate Number of Objects · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.912025
LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.912025
LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › knowledge-grounded generation
attributed text generation
0.812024
Attribute First, then Generate: Locally-attributable Grounded Text Generation · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
implicit argument prediction
0.812024
Explicating the Implicit: Argument Detection Beyond Sentence Boundaries · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
attribute binding
0.712023
Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection
0.612022
Controlled Text Reduction · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.612022
QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.612022
Controlled Text Reduction · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization
0.312026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
controlled decoding
0.312026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability › factuality
factual consistency
0.312026
PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.212024
Attribute First, then Generate: Locally-attributable Grounded Text Generation · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation
0.212022
QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled decoding · 1.0beam reranking · 1.0NLI · 1.0instance identity features · 0.9denoising guidance · 0.9sequential sentence generation · 0.8sentence planning · 0.8content selection · 0.8syntactic analysis · 0.7cross-attention loss optimization · 0.7supervised learning · 0.6summary-source alignment · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PrefixNLI: Detecting Factual Inconsistencies as Soon as They Arise
abstract
Natural Language Inference (NLI) models have been used in various ways to improve the factuality of LLM outputs.This is typically done by applying an NLI model to judge whether the model output is entailed from the supposed evidence, triggering some corrective actions, such as beam reranking at inference time or RL rewards during training.While NLI models are trained to detect factual inconsistencies over complete sentences, decisions in the common autoregressive generation architecture are made for each evolving text prefix, during decoding.Addressing this setting, we generalize the entailment detection task to apply over arbitrary text prefixes, and suggest its utility for improving generation faithfulness.Providing suitable evaluation and training datasets for this task, we train MiniTruePrefixes, a novel specialized model that better detects factual inconsistencies over text prefixes, outperforming comparable baseline NLI models by 5-14 F1 points in prefix-level entailment.We further demonstrate that integrating MiniTruePrefixes into a controlled decoding framework substantially improves factual consistency in abstractive summarization.When guided by Mini-TruePrefixes, LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instructmatches the faithfulness and runtime of the 8B model from the same model family, while using only half the memory.
Sapir Harary, Eran Hirsch, Aviv Slobodkin, David Wan, Mohit Bansal, Ido Dagan
ACL (1)2
2025 LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation
abstract
Eran Hirsch, Aviv Slobodkin, David Wan, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Eran Hirsch, Aviv Slobodkin, David Wan, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal, Ido Dagan
ACL (1)1
2025 Make It Count: Text-to-Image Generation with an Accurate Number of Objects
abstract
Despite the unprecedented success of text-to-image diffusion models, controlling the number of depicted objects using text is surprisingly hard. This is important for various applications from technical documents, to children’s books to illustrating cooking recipes. Generating object-correct counts is fundamentally challenging because the generative model needs to keep a sense of separate identity for every instance of the object, even if several objects look identical or overlap, and then carry out a global computation implicitly during generation. It is still unknown if such representations exist. To address count-correct generation, we first identify features within the diffusion model that can carry the object identity information. We then use them to separate and count instances of objects during the denoising process and detect over-generation and under-generation. We fix the latter by training a model that predicts both the shape and location of a missing object, based on the layout of existing ones, and show how it can be used to guide denoising with correct object count. Our approach, CountGen, does not depend on external source to determine object layout, but rather uses the prior from the diffusion model itself, creating prompt-dependent and seed-dependent layouts. Evaluated on two benchmark datasets, we find that CountGen strongly outperforms the count-accuracy of existing baselines. Project page: https://make-it-count-paper.github.io/
Lital Binyamin, Yoad Tewel, Hilit Segev, Eran Hirsch, Royi Rassin, Gal Chechik
CVPR4
2024 Explicating the Implicit: Argument Detection Beyond Sentence Boundaries
abstract
Paul Roit, Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch, Arie Cattan, Ayal Klein, Valentina Pyatkin, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Paul Roit, Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch, Arie Cattan, Ayal Klein, Valentina Pyatkin, Ido Dagan
ACL (1)3
2024 Attribute First, then Generate: Locally-attributable Grounded Text Generation
abstract
Recent efforts to address hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) have focused on attributed text generation, which supplements generated texts with citations of supporting sources for post-generation fact-checking and corrections.Yet, these citations often point to entire documents or paragraphs, burdening users with extensive verification work.In this paper, we introduce a locally-attributable text generation approach, prioritizing concise attributions.Our method, named "Attribute First, then Generate", breaks down the conventional end-to-end generation process into three intuitive steps: content selection, sentence planning, and sequential sentence generation.By initially identifying relevant source segments ("select first") and then conditioning the generation process on them ("then generate"), we ensure these segments also act as the output's fine-grained attributions ("select" becomes "attribute").Tested on Multi-document Summarization and Long-form Question-answering, our method not only yields more concise citations than the baselines but also maintains-and in some cases enhances-both generation quality and attribution accuracy.Furthermore, it significantly reduces the time required for fact verification by human assessors.
Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch, Arie Cattan, Tal Schuster, Ido Dagan
ACL (1)2
2023 Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment
abstract
Text-conditioned image generation models often generate incorrect associations between entities and their visual attributes. This reflects an impaired mapping between linguistic binding of entities and modifiers in the prompt and visual binding of the corresponding elements in the generated image. As one example, a query like ``a pink sunflower and a yellow flamingo'' may incorrectly produce an image of a yellow sunflower and a pink flamingo. To remedy this issue, we propose SynGen, an approach which first syntactically analyses the prompt to identify entities and their modifiers, and then uses a novel loss function that encourages the cross-attention maps to agree with the linguistic binding reflected by the syntax. Specifically, we encourage large overlap between attention maps of entities and their modifiers, and small overlap with other entities and modifier words. The loss is optimized during inference, without retraining or fine-tuning the model. Human evaluation on three datasets, including one new and challenging set, demonstrate significant improvements of SynGen compared with current state of the art methods. This work highlights how making use of sentence structure during inference can efficiently and substantially improve the faithfulness of text-to-image generation.
Royi Rassin, Eran Hirsch, Daniel Glickman, Shauli Ravfogel, Yoav Goldberg, Gal Chechik
NeurIPS2
2022 QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics
abstract
Various works suggest the appeal of incorporating explicit semantic representations when addressing challenging realistic NLP scenarios.Common approaches offer either comprehensive linguistically-based formalisms, like AMR, or alternatively Open-IE, which provides a shallow and partial representation.More recently, an appealing trend introduces semi-structured natural-language structures as an intermediate meaning-capturing representation, often in the form of questions and answers.In this work, we further promote this line of research by considering three prior QA-based semantic representations.These cover verbal, nominalized and discourse-based predications, regarded here as jointly providing a comprehensive representation of textual informationtermed QASem.To facilitate this perspective, we investigate how to best utilize pre-trained sequence-to-sequence language models, which seem particularly promising for generating representations that consist of natural language expressions (questions and answers).In particular, we examine and analyze input and output linearization strategies, as well as data augmentation and multitask learning for a scarce training data setup.Consequently, we release the first unified QASem parsing tool, easily applicable for downstream tasks that can benefit from an explicit semi-structured account of information units in text.
Ayal Klein, Eran Hirsch, Ron Eliav, Valentina Pyatkin, Avi Caciularu, Ido Dagan
EMNLP2
2022 Controlled Text Reduction
abstract
Producing a reduced version of a source text, as in generic or focused summarization, inherently involves two distinct subtasks: deciding on targeted content and generating a coherent text conveying it.While some popular approaches address summarization as a single end-to-end task, prominent works support decomposed modeling for individual subtasks.Further, semi-automated text reduction is also very appealing, where users may identify targeted content while models would generate a corresponding coherent summary.In this paper, we focus on the second subtask, of generating coherent text given pre-selected content.Concretely, we formalize Controlled Text Reduction as a standalone task, whose input is a source text with marked spans of targeted content ("highlighting").A model then needs to generate a coherent text that includes all and only the target information.We advocate the potential of such models, both for modular fully-automatic summarization, as well as for semi-automated human-in-the-loop use cases.Facilitating proper research, we crowdsource high-quality dev and test datasets for the task.Further, we automatically generate a larger "silver" training dataset from available summarization benchmarks, leveraging a pretrained summary-source alignment model.Finally, employing these datasets, we present a supervised baseline model, showing promising results and insightful analyses.1
Aviv Slobodkin, Paul Roit, Eran Hirsch, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan
EMNLP3