Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keru Wu

dblp:303/0382 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 59% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 36% Trustworthy machine learning · 5%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
bayesian regression
0.912025
Bayesian Scalar-on-Image Regression with a Spatially Varying Single-layer Neural Network Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.912025
Prominent Roles of Conditionally Invariant Components in Domain Adaptation: Theory and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › instance weighting
importance weighting
0.912025
Prominent Roles of Conditionally Invariant Components in Domain Adaptation: Theory and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.612022
Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo › metropolis-hastings
metropolis-adjusted langevin algorithm
0.612022
Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312025
Prominent Roles of Conditionally Invariant Components in Domain Adaptation: Theory and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis
0.312025
Bayesian Scalar-on-Image Regression with a Spatially Varying Single-layer Neural Network Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
log-concave sampling
0.212022
Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient langevin dynamics · 1.7soft-thresholded gaussian process · 1.7posterior consistency · 1.7spectral gap analysis · 1.1langevin dynamics · 1.1importance weighting · 0.9domain invariant projection · 0.9conditional invariant penalty · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Prominent Roles of Conditionally Invariant Components in Domain Adaptation: Theory and Algorithms
abstract
Domain adaptation (DA) is a statistical learning problem that arises when the distribution of the source data used to train a model differs from that of the target data used to evaluate the model. While many DA algorithms have demonstrated considerable empirical success, blindly applying these algorithms can often lead to worse performance on new datasets. To address this, it is crucial to clarify the assumptions under which a DA algorithm has good target performance. In this work, we focus on the assumption of the presence of conditionally invariant components (CICs), which are relevant for prediction and remain conditionally invariant across the source and target data. We demonstrate that CICs, which can be estimated through conditional invariant penalty (CIP), play three prominent roles in providing target risk guarantees in DA. First, we propose a new algorithm based on CICs, importance-weighted conditional invariant penalty (IW-CIP), which has target risk guarantees beyond simple settings such as covariate shift and label shift. Second, we show that CICs help identify large discrepancies between source and target risks of other DA algorithms. Finally, we demonstrate that incorporating CICs into the domain invariant projection (DIP) algorithm can address its failure scenario caused by label-flipping features. We support our new algorithms and theoretical findings via numerical experiments on synthetic data, MNIST, CelebA, Camelyon17, and DomainNet datasets.
Keru Wu, Yuansi Chen, Wooseok Ha, Bin Yu 0001
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2025 Bayesian Scalar-on-Image Regression with a Spatially Varying Single-layer Neural Network Prior
abstract
Deep neural networks (DNN) have been widely used in scalar-on-image regression to predict an outcome variable from imaging predictors. However, training DNN typically requires large sample sizes for accurate prediction, and the resulting models often lack interpretability. In this work, we propose a novel Bayesian nonlinear scalar-on-image regression framework with a spatially varying single-layer neural network (SV-NN) prior. The SV-NN is constructed using a single hidden layer neural network with its weights generated by the soft-thresholded Gaussian process. Our framework enables the selection of interpretable image regions while achieving high prediction accuracy with limited training samples. The SV-NN offers large prior support for the imaging effect function, facilitating efficient posterior inference on image region selection and automatic network structures determination. We establish the posterior consistency for model parameters and selection consistency for image regions when the number of voxels/pixels grows much faster than the sample size. To ensure computational efficiency, we develop a stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD) algorithm for posterior inference. We evaluate our method through extensive comparisons with state-of-the-art deep learning approaches, analyzing multiple real datasets, including task fMRI data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.
Keru Wu
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2022 Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Sampling
abstract
We study the mixing time of the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) for sampling from a log-smooth and strongly log-concave distribution. We establish its optimal minimax mixing time under a warm start. Our main contribution is two-fold. First, for a $d$-dimensional log-concave density with condition number $\kappa$, we show that MALA with a warm start mixes in $\tilde O(\kappa \sqrt{d})$ iterations up to logarithmic factors. This improves upon the previous work on the dependency of either the condition number $\kappa$ or the dimension $d$. Our proof relies on comparing the leapfrog integrator with the continuous Hamiltonian dynamics, where we establish a new concentration bound for the acceptance rate. Second, we prove a spectral gap based mixing time lower bound for reversible MCMC algorithms on general state spaces. We apply this lower bound result to construct a hard distribution for which MALA requires at least $\tilde\Omega(\kappa \sqrt{d})$ steps to mix. The lower bound for MALA matches our upper bound in terms of condition number and dimension. Finally, numerical experiments are included to validate our theoretical results.
Keru Wu, Scott C. Schmidler, Yuansi Chen
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1