Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mufeng Tang
dblp:303/0510
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1586-9177ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 70% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
predictive coding networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple · ICLR 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple · ICLR 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › machine learning benchmarking
deep learning benchmarks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
hopfield network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Memory with Temporal Predictive Coding · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › cognitive modeling
memory models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Memory with Temporal Predictive Coding · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Memory with Temporal Predictive Coding · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural coding
predictive coding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Memory with Temporal Predictive Coding · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
predictive coding · 3.1statistical whitening · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made SimpleabstractIn this work, we tackle the problems of efficiency and scalability for predictive coding networks (PCNs) in machine learning. To do so, we propose a library that focuses on performance and simplicity, and use it to implement a large set of standard benchmarks for the community to use for their experiments. As most works in the field propose their own tasks and architectures, do not compare one against each other, and focus on small-scale tasks, a simple and fast open-source library, and a comprehensive set of benchmarks, would address all of these concerns. Then, we perform extensive tests on such benchmarks using both existing algorithms for PCNs, as well as adaptations of other methods popular in the bio-plausible deep learning community. All of this has allowed us to (i) test architectures much larger than commonly used in the literature, on more complex datasets; (ii) reach new state-of-the-art results in all of the tasks and dataset provided; (iii) clearly highlight what the current limitations of PCNs are, allowing us to state important future research directions. With the hope of galvanizing community efforts towards one of the main open problems in the field, scalability, we will release the code, tests, and benchmarks. Luca Pinchetti, Chang Qi, Oleh Lokshyn, Cornelius Emde, Amine M'Charrak, Mufeng Tang, Simon Frieder, Bayar Menzat, Gaspard Oliviers, Rafal Bogacz, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Tommaso Salvatori |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2025 | Predictive Coding Model Detects Novelty on Different Levels of Representation HierarchyabstractNovelty detection, also known as familiarity discrimination or recognition memory, refers to the ability to distinguish whether a stimulus has been seen before. It has been hypothesized that novelty detection can naturally arise within networks that store memory or learn efficient neural representation because these networks already store information on familiar stimuli. However, existing computational models supporting this idea have yet to reproduce the high capacity of human recognition memory, leaving the hypothesis in question. This article demonstrates that predictive coding, an established model previously shown to effectively support representation learning and memory, can also naturally discriminate novelty with high capacity. The predictive coding model includes neurons encoding prediction errors, and we show that these neurons produce higher activity for novel stimuli, so that the novelty can be decoded from their activity. Additionally, hierarchical predictive coding networks detect novelty at different levels of abstraction within the hierarchy, from low-level sensory features like arrangements of pixels to high-level semantic features like object identities. Overall, based on predictive coding, this article establishes a unified framework that brings together novelty detection, associative memory, and representation learning, demonstrating that a single model can capture these various cognitive functions. T. Ed Li, Mufeng Tang, Rafal Bogacz |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 2024 | Predictive coding networks for temporal predictionabstractOne of the key problems the brain faces is inferring the state of the world from a sequence of dynamically changing stimuli, and it is not yet clear how the sensory system achieves this task. A well-established computational framework for describing perceptual processes in the brain is provided by the theory of predictive coding. Although the original proposals of predictive coding have discussed temporal prediction, later work developing this theory mostly focused on static stimuli, and key questions on neural implementation and computational properties of temporal predictive coding networks remain open. Here, we address these questions and present a formulation of the temporal predictive coding model that can be naturally implemented in recurrent networks, in which activity dynamics rely only on local inputs to the neurons, and learning only utilises local Hebbian plasticity. Additionally, we show that temporal predictive coding networks can approximate the performance of the Kalman filter in predicting behaviour of linear systems, and behave as a variant of a Kalman filter which does not track its own subjective posterior variance. Importantly, temporal predictive coding networks can achieve similar accuracy as the Kalman filter without performing complex mathematical operations, but just employing simple computations that can be implemented by biological networks. Moreover, when trained with natural dynamic inputs, we found that temporal predictive coding can produce Gabor-like, motion-sensitive receptive fields resembling those observed in real neurons in visual areas. In addition, we demonstrate how the model can be effectively generalized to nonlinear systems. Overall, models presented in this paper show how biologically plausible circuits can predict future stimuli and may guide research on understanding specific neural circuits in brain areas involved in temporal prediction. Beren Millidge, Mufeng Tang, Mahyar Osanlouy, Nicol S. Harper, Rafal Bogacz |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2023 | Sequential Memory with Temporal Predictive CodingabstractForming accurate memory of sequential stimuli is a fundamental function of biological agents. However, the computational mechanism underlying sequential memory in the brain remains unclear. Inspired by neuroscience theories and recent successes in applying predictive coding (PC) to \emph{static} memory tasks, in this work we propose a novel PC-based model for \emph{sequential} memory, called \emph{temporal predictive coding} (tPC). We show that our tPC models can memorize and retrieve sequential inputs accurately with a biologically plausible neural implementation. Importantly, our analytical study reveals that tPC can be viewed as a classical Asymmetric Hopfield Network (AHN) with an implicit statistical whitening process, which leads to more stable performance in sequential memory tasks of structured inputs. Moreover, we find that tPC exhibits properties consistent with behavioral observations and theories in neuroscience, thereby strengthening its biological relevance. Our work establishes a possible computational mechanism underlying sequential memory in the brain that can also be theoretically interpreted using existing memory model frameworks. Mufeng Tang, Helen Barron, Rafal Bogacz |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Recurrent predictive coding models for associative memory employing covariance learningabstractThe computational principles adopted by the hippocampus in associative memory (AM) tasks have been one of the most studied topics in computational and theoretical neuroscience. Recent theories suggested that AM and the predictive activities of the hippocampus could be described within a unitary account, and that predictive coding underlies the computations supporting AM in the hippocampus. Following this theory, a computational model based on classical hierarchical predictive networks was proposed and was shown to perform well in various AM tasks. However, this fully hierarchical model did not incorporate recurrent connections, an architectural component of the CA3 region of the hippocampus that is crucial for AM. This makes the structure of the model inconsistent with the known connectivity of CA3 and classical recurrent models such as Hopfield Networks, which learn the covariance of inputs through their recurrent connections to perform AM. Earlier PC models that learn the covariance information of inputs explicitly via recurrent connections seem to be a solution to these issues. Here, we show that although these models can perform AM, they do it in an implausible and numerically unstable way. Instead, we propose alternatives to these earlier covariance-learning predictive coding networks, which learn the covariance information implicitly and plausibly, and can use dendritic structures to encode prediction errors. We show analytically that our proposed models are perfectly equivalent to the earlier predictive coding model learning covariance explicitly, and encounter no numerical issues when performing AM tasks in practice. We further show that our models can be combined with hierarchical predictive coding networks to model the hippocampo-neocortical interactions. Our models provide a biologically plausible approach to modelling the hippocampal network, pointing to a potential computational mechanism during hippocampal memory formation and recall, which employs both predictive coding and covariance learning based on the recurrent network structure of the hippocampus. Mufeng Tang, Tommaso Salvatori, Beren Millidge, Yuhang Song 0001, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Rafal Bogacz |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |