Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matt Vitelli
dblp:303/0728
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › safe motion planning
safe planning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SafetyNet: Safe Planning for Real-World Self-Driving Vehicles Using Machine-Learned Policies · ICRA 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | SafetyNet: Safe Planning for Real-World Self-Driving Vehicles Using Machine-Learned Policies · ICRA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rule-based fallback layer · 0.6imitation learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | SafetyNet: Safe Planning for Real-World Self-Driving Vehicles Using Machine-Learned PoliciesabstractIn this paper we present the first safe system for full control of self-driving vehicles trained from human demonstrations and deployed in challenging, real-world, urban environments. Current industry-standard solutions use rule-based systems for planning. Although they perform reasonably well in common scenarios, the engineering complexity renders this approach incompatible with human-level performance. On the other hand, the performance of machine-learned (ML) planning solutions can be improved by simply adding more exemplar data. However, ML methods cannot offer safety guarantees and sometimes behave unpredictably. To combat this, our approach uses a simple yet effective rule-based fallback layer that performs sanity checks on an ML planner's decisions (e.g. avoiding collision, assuring physical feasibility). This allows us to leverage ML to handle complex situations while still assuring the safety, reducing ML planner-only collisions by 95%. We train our ML planner on 300 hours of expert driving demonstrations using imitation learning and deploy it along with the fallback layer in downtown San Francisco, where it takes complete control of a real vehicle and navigates a wide variety of challenging urban driving scenarios. Matt Vitelli, Yan Chang, Yawei Ye, Ana Sofia Rufino Ferreira, Maciej Wolczyk, Blazej Osinski, Moritz Niendorf, Hugo Grimmett, Qiangui Huang, Ashesh Jain, Peter Ondruska |
ICRA | 1 |