Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bradley Brown
dblp:303/1160
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 36% 3D vision · 36% Image recognition and object detection · 28% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d generation
3d scene generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Visual content generation and editing
3d content creation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Visual content generation and editing › scene authoring
scene generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › rotation-aware object detection
rotation-invariant object detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Rotation Invariance in Object Detection · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural field · 1.3hierarchical diffusion · 1.3autoencoder · 1.3uncertainty loss · 0.5rotation augmentation · 0.5differentiable label approximation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | NeuralField-LDM: Scene Generation with Hierarchical Latent Diffusion ModelsabstractAutomatically generating high-quality real world 3D scenes is of enormous interest for applications such as virtual reality and robotics simulation. Towards this goal, we introduce NeuralField-LDM, a generative model capable of synthesizing complex 3D environments. We leverage Latent Diffusion Models that have been successfully utilized for efficient high-quality 2D content creation. We first train a scene auto-encoder to express a set of image and pose pairs as a neural field, represented as density and feature voxel grids that can be projected to produce novel views of the scene. To further compress this representation, we train a latent-autoencoder that maps the voxel grids to a set of latent representations. A hierarchical diffusion model is then fit to the latents to complete the scene generation pipeline. We achieve a substantial improvement over existing state-of-the-art scene generation models. Additionally, we show how NeuralField-LDM can be used for a variety of 3D content creation applications, including conditional scene generation, scene inpainting and scene style manipulation. Seung Wook Kim 0001, Bradley Brown, Kangxue Yin, Karsten Kreis, Katja Schwarz, Daiqing Li, Robin Rombach, Antonio Torralba 0001, Sanja Fidler |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | Towards Rotation Invariance in Object DetectionabstractRotation augmentations generally improve a model’s in-variance/equivariance to rotation - except in object detection. In object detection the shape is not known, therefore rotation creates a label ambiguity. We show that the de-facto method for bounding box label rotation, the Largest Box Method, creates very large labels, leading to poor performance and in many cases worse performance than using no rotation at all. We propose a new method of rotation augmentation that can be implemented in a few lines of code. First, we create a differentiable approximation of label accuracy and show that axis-aligning the bounding box around an ellipse is optimal. We then introduce Rotation Uncertainty (RU) Loss, allowing the model to adapt to the uncertainty of the labels. On five different datasets (including COCO, PascalVOC, and Transparent Object Bin Picking), this approach improves the rotational invariance of both one-stage and two-stage architectures when measured with AP, AP50, and AP75. Agastya Kalra, Guy Stoppi, Bradley Brown, Rishav Agarwal, Achuta Kadambi |
ICCV | 3 |