Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhaoyang Zhu

dblp:303/4999 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Time series and sequential data · 58% Reinforcement learning · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › non-stationary environments
concept drift
0.912025
Learning to Extrapolate and Adjust: Two-Stage Meta-Learning for Concept Drift in Online Time Series Forecasting · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.912025
Learning to Extrapolate and Adjust: Two-Stage Meta-Learning for Concept Drift in Online Time Series Forecasting · IJCAI 2025
Energy systems and smart grids
load forecasting
0.712023
eForecaster: Unifying Electricity Forecasting with Robust, Flexible, and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms · AAAI 2023
Energy systems and smart grids › energy forecasting
renewable energy forecasting
0.712023
eForecaster: Unifying Electricity Forecasting with Robust, Flexible, and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212023
eForecaster: Unifying Electricity Forecasting with Robust, Flexible, and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
model explanation
0.212023
eForecaster: Unifying Electricity Forecasting with Robust, Flexible, and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 1.3interpretation methods · 1.3surrogate loss · 0.9meta-learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Semantic segmentation network for remote sensing images based on category-aware cross-fusion
Zhaoyang Zhu, Shudong Liu 0001, Haijie Qin
Multim. Syst.2
2025 Learning to Extrapolate and Adjust: Two-Stage Meta-Learning for Concept Drift in Online Time Series Forecasting
abstract
The inherent non-stationarity of time series in practical applications poses significant challenges for accurate forecasting. This paper tackles the concept drift problem where the underlying distribution or environment of time series changes. To better describe the characteristics and effectively model concept drifts, we first classify them into macro-drift (stable, long-term changes) and micro-drift (sudden, short-term fluctuations). Next, we propose a unified meta-learning framework called LEAF (Learning to Extrapolate and Adjust for Forecasting), where an extrapolation module is first introduced to track and extrapolate the prediction model in latent space considering macro-drift, and then an adjustment module incorporates meta-learnable surrogate loss to capture sample-specific micro-drift patterns. LEAF’s dual-stage approach effectively addresses diverse concept drifts and is model-agnostic which can be compatible with any deep prediction model. We further provide theoretical analysis to justify why the proposed framework can handle macro-drift and micro-drift. To facilitate further research in this field, we release three electric load time series datasets collected from real-world scenarios, exhibiting diverse and typical concept drifts. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of LEAF.
Zhaoyang Zhu, Yifan Zhang 0004, Lefei Shen, Linxiao Yang, Qingsong Wen, Liang Sun 0001
IJCAI2
2023 eForecaster: Unifying Electricity Forecasting with Robust, Flexible, and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms
abstract
Electricity forecasting is crucial in scheduling and planning of future electric load, so as to improve the reliability and safeness of the power grid. Despite recent developments of forecasting algorithms in the machine learning community, there is a lack of general and advanced algorithms specifically considering requirements from the power industry perspective. In this paper, we present eForecaster, a unified AI platform including robust, flexible, and explainable machine learning algorithms for diversified electricity forecasting applications. Since Oct. 2021, multiple commercial bus load, system load, and renewable energy forecasting systems built upon eForecaster have been deployed in seven provinces of China. The deployed systems consistently reduce the average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) by 39.8% to 77.0%, with reduced manual work and explainable guidance. In particular, eForecaster also integrates multiple interpretation methods to uncover the working mechanism of the predictive models, which significantly improves forecasts adoption and user satisfaction.
Zhaoyang Zhu, Tian Zhou 0004, Peisong Niu, Bingqing Peng, Hengbo Liu, Ziqing Ma, Qingsong Wen, Liang Sun 0001
AAAI1