Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keqiong Zhang

dblp:303/7683 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
molecular docking
0.612022
Docking cyclic peptides formed by a disulfide bond through a hierarchical strategy · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
protein-peptide docking
0.612022
Docking cyclic peptides formed by a disulfide bond through a hierarchical strategy · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical docking · 0.6MODPEP2.0 · 0.6ITScorePP · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Docking cyclic peptides formed by a disulfide bond through a hierarchical strategy
abstract
MOTIVATION: Cyclization is a common strategy to enhance the therapeutic potential of peptides. Many cyclic peptide drugs have been approved for clinical use, in which the disulfide-driven cyclic peptide is one of the most prevalent categories. Molecular docking is a powerful computational method to predict the binding modes of molecules. For protein-cyclic peptide docking, a big challenge is considering the flexibility of peptides with conformers constrained by cyclization. RESULTS: Integrating our efficient peptide 3D conformation sampling algorithm MODPEP2.0 and knowledge-based scoring function ITScorePP, we have proposed an extended version of our hierarchical peptide docking algorithm, named HPEPDOCK2.0, to predict the binding modes of the peptide cyclized through a disulfide against a protein. Our HPEPDOCK2.0 approach was extensively evaluated on diverse test sets and compared with the state-of-the-art cyclic peptide docking program AutoDock CrankPep (ADCP). On a benchmark dataset of 18 cyclic peptide-protein complexes, HPEPDOCK2.0 obtained a native contact fraction of above 0.5 for 61% of the cases when the top prediction was considered, compared with 39% for ADCP. On a larger test set of 25 cyclic peptide-protein complexes, HPEPDOCK2.0 yielded a success rate of 44% for the top prediction, compared with 20% for ADCP. In addition, HPEPDOCK2.0 was also validated on two other test sets of 10 and 11 complexes with apo and predicted receptor structures, respectively. HPEPDOCK2.0 is computationally efficient and the average running time for docking a cyclic peptide is about 34 min on a single CPU core, compared with 496 min for ADCP. HPEPDOCK2.0 will facilitate the study of the interaction between cyclic peptides and proteins and the development of therapeutic cyclic peptide drugs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://huanglab.phys.hust.edu.cn/hpepdock/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Huanyu Tao, Xuejun Zhao, Keqiong Zhang, Peicong Lin, Sheng-You Huang
Bioinform.3