Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaofei Wen
dblp:303/7944
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
red teaming |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | RedCoder: Automated Multi-Turn Red Teaming for Code LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | RedCoder: Automated Multi-Turn Red Teaming for Code LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
automated attack generation · 2.0multi-turn red-teaming · 1.0multi-turn red teaming · 1.0red teaming · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | RedCoder: Automated Multi-Turn Red Teaming for Code LLMsabstractWenjie Jacky Mo, Qin Liu, Xiaofei Wen, Dongwon Jung, Hadi Askari, Wenxuan Zhou, Zhe Zhao, Muhao Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Wenjie Mo 0001, Qin Liu 0010, Xiaofei Wen, Dongwon Jung, Hadi Askari, Wenxuan Zhou 0002, Muhao Chen 0001 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Red Teaming Language Models for Processing Contradictory DialoguesabstractMost language models currently available are prone to self-contradiction during dialogues.To mitigate this issue, this study explores a novel contradictory dialogue processing task that aims to detect and modify contradictory statements in a conversation.This task is inspired by research on context faithfulness and dialogue comprehension, which have demonstrated that the detection and understanding of contradictions often necessitate detailed explanations.We develop a dataset comprising contradictory dialogues, in which one side of the conversation contradicts itself.Each dialogue is accompanied by an explanatory label that highlights the location and details of the contradiction.With this dataset, we present a Red Teaming framework for contradictory dialogue processing.The framework detects and attempts to explain the dialogue, then modifies the existing contradictory content using the explanation.Our experiments demonstrate that the framework improves the ability to detect contradictory dialogues and provides valid explanations.Additionally, it showcases distinct capabilities for modifying such dialogues.Our study highlights the importance of the logical inconsistency problem in conversational AI 1 Prompts Instructions Explanation Xiaofei Wen, Bangzheng Li, Tenghao Huang, Muhao Chen 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |