Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bowei Zhu

dblp:304/1543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Learning theory · 48% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% Learning paradigms · 6%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
2.432025
Towards Improved Risk Bounds for Transductive Learning · IJCAI 2025
Towards Sharper Risk Bounds for Minimax Problems · IJCAI 2024
Algorithmic Stability Unleashed: Generalization Bounds with Unbounded Losses · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model merging
adapter composition
0.912025
IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization
0.912025
Towards Improved Risk Bounds for Transductive Learning · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model merging
LoRA merging
0.912025
IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.912025
IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.912025
IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
transductive learning
0.912025
Towards Improved Risk Bounds for Transductive Learning · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
variance regularization
0.912025
Towards Improved Risk Bounds for Transductive Learning · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
algorithmic stability
0.812024
Algorithmic Stability Unleashed: Generalization Bounds with Unbounded Losses · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities
0.812024
Algorithmic Stability Unleashed: Generalization Bounds with Unbounded Losses · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization
0.812024
Towards Sharper Risk Bounds for Minimax Problems · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
risk bounds
0.812024
Towards Sharper Risk Bounds for Minimax Problems · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
approximate cross-validation
0.512021
General Approximate Cross Validation for Model Selection: Supervised, Semi-supervised and Pairwise Learning · ACM Multimedia 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
cross-validation
0.512021
General Approximate Cross Validation for Model Selection: Supervised, Semi-supervised and Pairwise Learning · ACM Multimedia 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.512021
General Approximate Cross Validation for Model Selection: Supervised, Semi-supervised and Pairwise Learning · ACM Multimedia 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.312025
IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.312025
IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

concentration inequalities · 1.6regularization · 0.9optimization · 0.9iterative inference-solving · 0.9generic chaining · 0.9empirical process theory · 0.9adaptive weighting · 0.9minimax optimization theory · 0.8algorithmic stability analysis · 0.8cross-validation approximation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 IterIS: Iterative Inference-Solving Alignment for LoRA Merging
abstract
Low-rank adaptations (LoRA) are widely used to fine-tune large models across various domains for specific downstream tasks. While task-specific LoRAs are often available, concerns about data privacy and intellectual property can restrict access to training data, limiting the acquisition of a multi-task model through gradient-based training. In response, LoRA merging presents an effective solution by combining multiple LoRAs into a unified adapter while maintaining data privacy. Prior works on LoRA merging primarily frame it as an optimization problem, yet these approaches face several limitations, including the rough assumption about input features utilized in optimization, massive sample requirements, and the unbalanced optimization objective. These limitations can significantly degrade performance. To address these, we propose a novel optimization-based method, named IterIS: 1) We formulate LoRA merging as an advanced optimization problem to mitigate the rough assumption. Additionally, we employ an iterative inference-solving framework in our algorithm. It can progressively refine the optimization objective for improved performance. 2) We introduce an efficient regularization term to reduce the need for massive sample requirements (requiring only 1-5% of the unlabeled samples compared to prior methods). 3) We utilize adaptive weights in the optimization objective to mitigate potential unbalances in LoRA merging process. Our method demonstrates significant improvements over multiple baselines and state-of-the-art methods in composing tasks for text-to-image diffusion, vision-language models, and large language models. Furthermore, our layer-wise algorithm can achieve convergence with minimal steps, ensuring efficiency in both memory and computation.
Hongxu Chen 0002, Zhen Wang 0004, Runshi Li, Bowei Zhu, Long Chen 0016
CVPR4
2025 Towards Improved Risk Bounds for Transductive Learning
abstract
Transductive learning is a popular setting in statistic learning theory, reasoning from observed, specific training cases to specific test cases, which has been widely used in many fields such as graph neural networks and semi-supervised learning. Existing results provide fast rates of convergence based on the traditional local techniques, which need the surrogate function that upper bounds the uniform error within a localized region to be ``sub-root''. We derive new version of concentration inequality for empirical processes in transductive learning and apply generic chaining technique to relax the assumptions and gain tighter results in empirical risk minimization. Furthermore, we concentrate on the generalization of moment penalization algorithm. We design a novel estimator based on the second moment (variance) penalization and derive its learning rates, which is the first theoretical generalization analysis considering variance-based algorithms.
Bowei Zhu, Yong Liu 0018
IJCAI1
2025 Stability and Sharper Risk Bounds with Convergence Rate Õ(1/n2)
Bowei Zhu, Mingyang Yi, Yong Liu 0018
NeurIPS1
2024 Algorithmic Stability Unleashed: Generalization Bounds with Unbounded Losses
abstract
One of the central problems of statistical learning theory is quantifying the generalization ability of learning algorithms within a probabilistic framework. Algorithmic stability is a powerful tool for deriving generalization bounds, however, it typically builds on a critical assumption that losses are bounded. In this paper, we relax this condition to unbounded loss functions with subweibull diameter. This gives new generalization bounds for algorithmic stability and also includes existing results of subgaussian and subexponential diameters as specific cases. Furthermore, we provide a refined stability analysis by developing generalization bounds which can be $\sqrt{n}$-times faster than the previous results, where $n$ is the sample size. Our main technical contribution is general concentration inequalities for subweibull random variables, which may be of independent interest.
Bowei Zhu, Yong Liu 0018
ICML2
2024 Towards Sharper Risk Bounds for Minimax Problems
Bowei Zhu, Yong Liu 0018
IJCAI1
2021 General Approximate Cross Validation for Model Selection: Supervised, Semi-supervised and Pairwise Learning
abstract
Cross-validation (CV) is a ubiquitous model-agnostic tool for assessing the error of machine learning. However, it has high complexity due to the requirement of multiple times of learner training especially in multimedia tasks with huge amounts of data. In this paper, we provide a unified framework to approximate the CV error for various common multimedia tasks such as supervised, semi-supervised and pairwise learning which requires training only once. Moreover, we study the theoretical performance of the proposed approximate CV and provide an explicit finite-sample error bound. Experimental results on several datasets demonstrate that our approximate CV has no statistical discrepancy from the original CV, but can significantly improve the efficiency, which is a great advantage in model selection.
Bowei Zhu, Yong Liu 0018
ACM Multimedia1