Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryan Teehan
dblp:304/2042
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1426-6964ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Generative modeling · 25% Information extraction and text analysis · 14% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the Oracle · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
inference-time steering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the Oracle · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › computational creativity
creative generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProCreate, Don't Reproduce! Propulsive Energy Diffusion for Creative Generation · ECCV (60) 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot task generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward function · 0.9retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9resampling · 0.9feynman-kac interacting particle systems · 0.9propulsive energy diffusion · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8multitask prompted training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the OracleabstractMany existing evaluation benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) quickly become outdated due to the emergence of new models and training data. These benchmarks also fall short in assessing how LLM performance changes over time, as they consist of a static set of questions without a temporal dimension. To address these limitations, we propose using future event prediction as a continuous evaluation method to assess LLMs' temporal generalization and forecasting abilities. Our benchmark, Daily Oracle, automatically generates question-answer (QA) pairs from daily news, challenging LLMs to predict "future" event outcomes. Our findings reveal that as pre-training data becomes outdated, LLM performance degrades over time. While Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has the potential to enhance prediction accuracy, the performance degradation pattern persists, highlighting the need for continuous model updates. Code and data are available at https://agenticlearning.ai/daily-oracle. Hui Dai, Ryan Teehan, Mengye Ren |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion ModelsabstractDiffusion models have demonstrated remarkable performance in generative modeling, but generating samples with specific desiderata remains challenging. Existing solutions --- such as fine-tuning, best-of-n sampling, and gradient-based guidance --- are expensive, inefficient, or limited in applicability. In this work, we propose FK steering, a framework for inference-time steering diffusion models with reward functions. In this work, we introduce FK steering, which applies Feynman-Kac interacting particle systems to the inference-time steering of diffusion models with arbitrary reward functions. FK steering works by generating multiple trajectories, called particles, and resampling particles at intermediate steps based on scores computed using functions called potentials. Potentials are defined using rewards for intermediate states and are chosen such that a high score indicates the particle will yield a high-reward sample. We explore various choices of potentials, rewards, and samplers. Steering text-to-image models with a human preference reward, we find that FK steering outperforms fine-tuned models with just 2 particles. Moreover, FK steering a 0.8B parameter model outperforms a 2.6B model, achieving state-of-the-art performance on prompt fidelity. We also steer text diffusion models with rewards for text quality and rare attributes such as toxicity, and find that FK steering generates lower perplexity text and enables gradient-free control. Overall, inference-time scaling and steering of diffusion models, even training-free, provides significant quality and controllability benefits. Code available [here](https://github.com/zacharyhorvitz/FK-Diffusion-Steering). Raghav Singhal, Zachary Horvitz, Ryan Teehan, Mengye Ren, Kathy McKeown, Rajesh Ranganath |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | ProCreate, Don't Reproduce! Propulsive Energy Diffusion for Creative Generation
Jack Lu, Ryan Teehan, Mengye Ren |
ECCV (60) | 2 |
| 2024 | Can Language Models Employ the Socratic Method? Experiments with Code DebuggingabstractWhen employing the Socratic method of teaching, instructors guide students toward solving a problem on their own rather than providing the solution directly. While this strategy can substantially improve learning outcomes, it is usually time-consuming and cognitively demanding. Automated Socratic conversational agents can augment human instruction and provide the necessary scale, however their development is hampered by the lack of suitable data for training and evaluation. In this paper, we introduce a manually created dataset of multi-turn Socratic advice that is aimed at helping a novice programmer fix buggy solutions to simple computational problems. The dataset is then used for benchmarking the Socratic debugging abilities of a number of language models, ranging from fine-tuning the instruction-based text-to-text transformer Flan-T5 to zero-shot and chain of thought prompting of the much larger GPT-4. The code and datasets are made freely available for research at the link below. Erfan Al-Hossami, Razvan C. Bunescu, Justin Smith 0008, Ryan Teehan |
SIGCSE (1) | 4 |
| 2022 | Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization
Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim 0002, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen 0001, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Févry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf 0008, Alexander M. Rush |
ICLR | 35 |