Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Se Hwan Jeon
dblp:304/2046
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2791-7850ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 65% Reinforcement learning · 31% Motion planning and robot control · 4% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots |
1.5 | 3 | 2024 | Learning Emergent Gaits with Decentralized Phase Oscillators: on the role of Observations, Rewards, and Feedback · ICRA 2024 Online Optimal Landing Control of the MIT Mini Cheetah · ICRA 2022 Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid Locomotion · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › gait generation
gait learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Emergent Gaits with Decentralized Phase Oscillators: on the role of Observations, Rewards, and Feedback · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
quadruped locomotion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Emergent Gaits with Decentralized Phase Oscillators: on the role of Observations, Rewards, and Feedback · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design › reward shaping
potential-based reward shaping |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid Locomotion · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid Locomotion · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
humanoid locomotion |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid Locomotion · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Online Optimal Landing Control of the MIT Mini Cheetah · ICRA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.4phase oscillator · 0.8ablation study · 0.8potential-based reward shaping · 0.7reaction force profiling · 0.6optimal control · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Learning Emergent Gaits with Decentralized Phase Oscillators: on the role of Observations, Rewards, and FeedbackabstractWe present a minimal phase oscillator model for learning quadrupedal locomotion. Each of the four oscillators is coupled only to itself and its corresponding leg through local feedback of the ground reaction force, which can be interpreted as an observer feedback gain. We interpret the oscillator itself as a latent contact state-estimator. Through a systematic ablation study, we show that the combination of phase observations, simple phase-based rewards, and the local feedback dynamics induces policies that exhibit emergent gait preferences, while using a reduced set of simple rewards, and without prescribing a specific gait. The code is open-source, and a video synopsis available at https://youtu.be/1NKQ0rSV3jU. Jenny Zhang, Steve Heim, Se Hwan Jeon, Sangbae Kim |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2023 | Benchmarking Potential Based Rewards for Learning Humanoid LocomotionabstractThe main challenge in developing effective reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines is often the design and tuning the reward functions. Well-designed shaping reward can lead to significantly faster learning. Naively formulated rewards, however, can conflict with the desired behavior and result in overfitting or even erratic performance if not properly tuned. In theory, the broad class of potential based reward shaping (PBRS) can help guide the learning process without affecting the optimal policy. Although several studies have explored the use of potential based reward shaping to accelerate learning convergence, most have been limited to grid-worlds and low-dimensional systems, and RL in robotics has predominantly relied on standard forms of reward shaping. In this paper, we benchmark standard forms of shaping with PBRS for a humanoid robot. We find that in this high-dimensional system, PBRS has only marginal benefits in convergence speed. However, the PBRS reward terms are significantly more robust to scaling than typical reward shaping approaches, and thus easier to tune. Se Hwan Jeon, Steve Heim, Charles Khazoom, Sangbae Kim |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | Online Optimal Landing Control of the MIT Mini CheetahabstractQuadrupedal landing is a complex process involving large impacts, elaborate contact transitions, and is a crucial recovery behavior observed in many biological animals. This work presents a real-time, optimal landing controller that is free of pre-specified contact schedules. The controller determines optimal touchdown postures and reaction force profiles and is able to recover from a variety of falling configurations. The quadrupedal platform used, the MIT Mini Cheetah, recovered safely from drops of up to 8 m in simulation, as well as from a range of orientations and planar velocities. The controller is also tested on hardware, successfully recovering from drops of up to 2 m. Se Hwan Jeon, Sangbae Kim, Donghyun Kim 0002 |
ICRA | 1 |