Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edgar A. Aguilar
dblp:304/2146
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1177-9246ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Autonomous driving · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
specification-based testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Specification-Guided Critical Scenario Identification for Automated Driving · FM 2023 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Specification-Guided Critical Scenario Identification for Automated Driving
Adam Molin, Edgar A. Aguilar, Dejan Nickovic, Mengjia Zhu, Alberto Bemporad, Hasan Esen |
FM | 2 |
| 2023 | Mining Specification Parameters for Multi-class Classification
Edgar A. Aguilar, Ezio Bartocci, Cristinel Mateis, Eleonora Nesterini, Dejan Nickovic |
RV | 1 |
| 2022 | Poster Abstract: Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Automata-encoded ObjectivesabstractIn this work, we propose the use of symbolic automata as formal specifications for reinforcement learning agents. The use of symbolic automata serves as a generalization of both bounded-time temporal logic-based specifications and deterministic finite automata, allowing us to describe input alphabets over metric spaces. Furthermore, our use of symbolic automata allows us to define non-sparse potential-based rewards which empirically shape the reward surface, leading to better convergence during RL. We also show that our potential-based rewarding strategy still allows us to obtain the policy that maximizes the satisfaction of the given specification. Anand Balakrishnan 0001, Stefan Jaksic, Edgar A. Aguilar, Dejan Nickovic, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh |
HSCC | 3 |