Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arijit Dasgupta

dblp:304/2246 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-0345-5529ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 87% Deep learning architectures and training · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
intuitive physics
0.612022
A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics · IJCAI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
physical reasoning
0.612022
A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics · IJCAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Seeing through Occlusion: Uncertainty-aware Joint Physical Tracking and Prediction
Arijit Dasgupta, Andrew D. Bolton, Vikash Mansinghka 0001, Josh Tenenbaum, Kevin A. Smith 0001
CogSci1
2023 A Benchmark for Modeling Violation-of-Expectation in Physical Reasoning Across Event Categories
Arijit Dasgupta, Jiafei Duan, Su-Hua Wang, Renée Baillargeon, Cheston Tan
CogSci1
2022 A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics
abstract
Research in cognitive science has provided extensive evidence of human cognitive ability in performing physical reasoning of objects from noisy perceptual inputs. Such a cognitive ability is commonly known as intuitive physics. With advancements in deep learning, there is an increasing interest in building intelligent systems that are capable of performing physical reasoning from a given scene for the purpose of building better AI systems. As a result, many contemporary approaches in modelling intuitive physics for machine cognition have been inspired by literature from cognitive science. Despite the wide range of work in physical reasoning for machine cognition, there is a scarcity of reviews that organize and group these deep learning approaches. Especially at the intersection of intuitive physics and artificial intelligence, there is a need to make sense of the diverse range of ideas and approaches. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive survey of recent advances and techniques in intuitive physics-inspired deep learning approaches for physical reasoning. The survey will first categorize existing deep learning approaches into three facets of physical reasoning before organizing them into three general technical approaches and propose six categorical tasks of the field. Finally, we highlight the challenges of the current field and present some future research directions.
Jiafei Duan, Arijit Dasgupta, Jason Fischer, Cheston Tan
IJCAI2