Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Da-Eun Ko

dblp:304/2299 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-3253-2429ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 25% Cellular and mobile networks · 25% Wireless networking · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › medium access control
collision avoidance
0.512021
Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization Considering Collisions in FSO Communication Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021
Physical-layer communications
free-space optical communication
0.512021
Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization Considering Collisions in FSO Communication Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021
Cellular and mobile networks
trajectory optimization
0.512021
Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization Considering Collisions in FSO Communication Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
unmanned aerial vehicles
0.512021
Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization Considering Collisions in FSO Communication Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
successive convex approximation
0.112021
Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization Considering Collisions in FSO Communication Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traveling salesman problem · 1.0successive convex approximation · 1.0graph partitioning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization Considering Collisions in FSO Communication Networks
abstract
In this paper, a trajectory optimization algorithm for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is investigated for free space optic (FSO) based wireless communication networks, which is composed of multiple UAVs and multiple ground terminals (GTs). Considering the FSO channel model and line of sight (LoS) probability, the altitude of the UAVs for FSO connection between each GT and UAV is decided by the predetermined radius of the communication area of the GT. A multi-UAV trajectory optimization (MUTO) scheme is proposed to maximize the service time. In the MUTO scheme, first, the network is divided into multiple sectors using graph partitioning, and assigned to each UAV, and then the traveling salesman problem (TSP) is used to determine the order of the GTs that the UAV passes through. The number of UAVs that maximizes the time for the UAV to stay within the communication area of the GT is derived. The UAV trajectories are determined by sequentially minimizing the energy consumed when moving between GTs and maximizing the service time by applying successive convex approximation. In addition, to assist operations that use multiple UAVs, two collision avoidance schemes are applied to the MUTO scheme. First is the additional constraints (AC) method, which uses a geographic formula to control the distance between the UAVs, and second is the initial delay (ID) method, which deliberately adds a delay to the UAV trajectories to provide sufficient UAV spacing. The simulation results show that under low density operation conditions, MUTO-ID and MUTO-AC are sufficient to avoid all UAV collisions, and in overly dense UAV operations with very close UAV trajectories, MUTO-ID can reduce collisions by approximately 80%, MUTO-AC can reduce collisions by approximately 85%, and MUTO-ACID can reduce collisions by approximately 95%, when compared to the MUTO scheme with no collision avoidance support applied.
Sooeun Song, Minsu Choi, Da-Eun Ko, Jong-Moon Chung
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.3