Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yaqing Yang

dblp:304/2876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-5858-4632ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy preferences
privacy preference modeling
0.812024
On the Feasibility of Predicting Users' Privacy Concerns using Contextual Labels and Personal Preferences · CHI 2024
Privacy and data protection
privacy perceptions
0.212024
On the Feasibility of Predicting Users' Privacy Concerns using Contextual Labels and Personal Preferences · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixed-methods analysis · 0.8contextual labeling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fine-grained structure-preserving composite degradation image restoration
Xinhua Su, Yaqing Yang, Junhao Mi, Huanmin Ge
Signal Process. Image Commun.2
2024 On the Feasibility of Predicting Users' Privacy Concerns using Contextual Labels and Personal Preferences
abstract
Predicting users’ privacy concerns is challenging due to privacy’s subjective and complex nature. Previous research demonstrated that generic attitudes, such as those captured by Westin’s Privacy Segmentation Index, are inadequate predictors of context-specific attitudes. We introduce ContextLabel, a method enabling practitioners to capture users’ privacy profiles across domains and predict their privacy concerns towards unseen data practices. ContextLabel’s key innovations are (1) using non-mutually exclusive labels to capture more nuances of data practices, and (2) capturing users’ privacy profiles by asking them to express privacy concerns to a few data practices. To explore the feasibility of ContextLabel, we asked 38 participants to express their thoughts in free text towards 13 distinct data practices across five days. Our mixed-methods analysis shows that a preliminary version of ContextLabel can predict users’ privacy concerns towards unseen data practices with an accuracy (73%) surpassing Privacy Segmentation Index (56%) and methods using categorical factors (59%).
Yaqing Yang, Tony W. Li, Haojian Jin
CHI1