Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Genghong Zhao

dblp:304/2986 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7020-862XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 58% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.812024
CoLAL: Co-learning Active Learning for Text Classification · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
co-learning
0.812024
CoLAL: Co-learning Active Learning for Text Classification · AAAI 2024
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph alignment
entity alignment
0.612022
Guiding Neural Entity Alignment with Compatibility · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.212024
CoLAL: Co-learning Active Learning for Text Classification · AAAI 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.212024
CoLAL: Co-learning Active Learning for Text Classification · AAAI 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph fusion
0.112021
ActiveEA: Active Learning for Neural Entity Alignment · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic graphical model · 0.8noisy labels · 0.8co-learning · 0.8training framework · 0.6neural entity alignment · 0.6uncertainty sampling · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5active learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Data augmented large language models for medical record generation
Xuanyi Zhang, Genghong Zhao, Jiren Liu
Appl. Intell.2
2024 CoLAL: Co-learning Active Learning for Text Classification
abstract
In the machine learning field, the challenge of effectively learning with limited data has become increasingly crucial. Active Learning (AL) algorithms play a significant role in this by enhancing model performance. We introduce a novel AL algorithm, termed Co-learning (CoLAL), designed to select the most diverse and representative samples within a training dataset. This approach utilizes noisy labels and predictions made by the primary model on unlabeled data. By leveraging a probabilistic graphical model, we combine two multi-class classifiers into a binary one. This classifier determines if both the main and the peer models agree on a prediction. If they do, the unlabeled sample is assumed to be easy to classify and is thus not beneficial to increase the target model's performance. We prioritize data that represents the unlabeled set without overlapping decision boundaries. The discrepancies between these boundaries can be estimated by the probability that two models result in the same prediction. Through theoretical analysis and experimental validation, we reveal that the integration of noisy labels into the peer model effectively identifies target model's potential inaccuracies. We evaluated the CoLAL method across seven benchmark datasets: four text datasets (AGNews, DBPedia, PubMed, SST-2) and text-based state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines, and three image datasets (CIFAR100, MNIST, OpenML-155) and computer vision SOTA baselines. The results show that our CoLAL method significantly outperforms existing SOTA in text-based AL, and is competitive with SOTA image-based AL techniques.
Linh Le, Genghong Zhao, Guido Zuccon, Gianluca Demartini
AAAI2
2022 Leveraging Semantic Type Dependencies for Medical Named Entity Recognition
Linh Le, Guido Zuccon, Genghong Zhao, Gianluca Demartini
AMIA3
2022 High-quality Task Division for Large-scale Entity Alignment
abstract
Entity Alignment (EA) aims to match equivalent entities that refer to the same real-world objects and is a key step for Knowledge Graph (KG) fusion. Most neural EA models cannot be applied to large-scale real-life KGs due to their excessive consumption of GPU memory and time. One promising solution is to divide a large EA task into several subtasks such that each subtask only needs to match two small subgraphs of the original KGs. However, it is challenging to divide the EA task without losing effectiveness. Existing methods display low coverage of potential mappings, insufficient evidence in context graphs, and largely differing subtask sizes.
Bing Liu 0025, Wen Hua, Guido Zuccon, Genghong Zhao
CIKM4
2022 Guiding Neural Entity Alignment with Compatibility
abstract
Entity Alignment (EA) aims to find equivalent entities between two Knowledge Graphs (KGs).While numerous neural EA models have been devised, they are mainly learned using labelled data only.In this work, we argue that different entities within one KG should have compatible counterparts in the other KG due to the potential dependencies among the entities.Making compatible predictions thus should be one of the goals of training an EA model along with fitting the labelled data: this aspect however is neglected in current methods.To power neural EA models with compatibility, we devise a training framework by addressing three problems: (1) how to measure the compatibility of an EA model; (2) how to inject the property of being compatible into an EA model; (3) how to optimise parameters of the compatibility model.Extensive experiments on widely-used datasets demonstrate the advantages of integrating compatibility within EA models.In fact, state-of-the-art neural EA models trained within our framework using just 5% of the labelled data can achieve comparable effectiveness with supervised training using 20% of the labelled data.
Bing Liu 0025, Harrisen Scells, Wen Hua, Guido Zuccon, Genghong Zhao
EMNLP5
2021 ActiveEA: Active Learning for Neural Entity Alignment
abstract
Entity Alignment (EA) aims to match equivalent entities across different Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and is an essential step of KG fusion.Current mainstream methods -neural EA models -rely on training with seed alignment, i.e., a set of pre-aligned entity pairs which are very costly to annotate.In this paper, we devise a novel Active Learning (AL) framework for neural EA, aiming to create highly informative seed alignment to obtain more effective EA models with less annotation cost.Our framework tackles two main challenges encountered when applying AL to EA:(1) How to exploit dependencies between entities within the AL strategy.Most AL strategies assume that the data instances to sample are independent and identically distributed.However, entities in KGs are related.To address this challenge, we propose a structure-aware uncertainty sampling strategy that can measure the uncertainty of each entity as well as its impact on its neighbour entities in the KG.(2) How to recognise entities that appear in one KG but not in the other KG (i.e., bachelors).Identifying bachelors would likely save annotation budget.To address this challenge, we devise a bachelor recognizer paying attention to alleviate the effect of sampling bias.Empirical results show that our proposed AL strategy can significantly improve sampling quality with good generality across different datasets, EA models and amount of bachelors.
Bing Liu 0025, Harrisen Scells, Guido Zuccon, Wen Hua, Genghong Zhao
EMNLP (1)5