Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Mia Garrard

dblp:304/3148 · also Mia R. Garrard · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.612022
Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation
0.612022
Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation
0.612022
Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
machine learning platform
0.612022
Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions · KDD 2022
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
0.212022
Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions · KDD 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

causal inference · 0.6black-box HTE explanation · 0.6bayesian optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions
abstract
Modern software systems and products increasingly rely on machine learning models to make data-driven decisions based on interactions with users, infrastructure and other systems. For broader adoption, this practice must (i) accommodate product engineers without ML backgrounds, (ii) support finegrain product-metric evaluation and (iii) optimize for product goals. To address shortcomings of prior platforms, we introduce general principles for and the architecture of an ML platform, Looper, with simple APIs for decision-making and feedback collection. Looper covers the end-to-end ML lifecycle from collecting training data and model training to deployment and inference, and extends support to personalization, causal evaluation with heterogenous treatment effects, and Bayesian tuning for product goals. During the 2021 production deployment, Looper simultaneously hosted 440-1,000 ML models that made 4-6 million real-time decisions per second. We sum up experiences of platform adopters and describe their learning curve.
Igor L. Markov, Hanson Wang, Nitya Kasturi, Shaun Singh, Mia Garrard, Sze Wai Yuen, Sarah Tran, Igor Glotov, Tanvi Gupta, Boshuang Huang, Xiaowen Xie, Michael Belkin, Sal Uryasev, Sam Howie, Eytan Bakshy, Norm Zhou
KDD5
2022 Interpretable Personalized Experimentation
abstract
Black-box heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) models are increasingly being used to create personalized policies that assign individuals to their optimal treatments. However, they are difficult to understand, and can be burdensome to maintain in a production environment. In this paper, we present a scalable, interpretable personalized experimentation system, implemented and deployed in production at Meta. The system works in a multiple treatment, multiple outcome setting typical at Meta to: (1) learn explanations for black-box HTE models; (2) generate interpretable personalized policies. We evaluate the methods used in the system on publicly available data and Meta use cases, and discuss lessons learnt during the development of the system.
Sarah Tan, Weiwei Li 0006, Mia Garrard, Adam Obeng, Drew Dimmery, Shaun Singh, Hanson Wang, Daniel R. Jiang, Eytan Bakshy
KDD4