Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason Fick

dblp:304/4307 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7049-3427ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 87% Usability and user experience research · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › robot design
robot sound design
0.512021
Bringing WALL-E out of the Silver Screen: Understanding How Transformative Robot Sound Affects Human Perception · ICRA 2021
Human-robot interaction › human behavior modeling › social perception
social perception of robots
0.512021
Bringing WALL-E out of the Silver Screen: Understanding How Transformative Robot Sound Affects Human Perception · ICRA 2021
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
subjective evaluation
0.112021
Bringing WALL-E out of the Silver Screen: Understanding How Transformative Robot Sound Affects Human Perception · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online video-based survey · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Hearing it Out: Guiding Robot Sound Design through Design Thinking
abstract
Sound can benefit human-robot interaction, but little work has explored questions on the design of nonverbal sound for robots. The unique confluence of sound design and robotics expertise complicates these questions, as most roboticists do not have sound design expertise, necessitating collaborations with sound designers. We sought to understand how roboticists and sound designers approach the problem of robot sound design through two qualitative studies. The first study followed discussions by robotics researchers in focus groups, where these experts described motivations to add robot sound for various purposes. The second study guided music technology students through a generative activity for robot sound design; these sound designers in-training demonstrated high variability in design intent, processes, and inspiration. To unify the two perspectives, we structured recommendations through the design thinking framework, a popular design process. The insights provided in this work may aid roboticists in implementing helpful sounds in their robots, encourage sound designers to enter into collaborations on robot sound, and give key tips and warnings to both.
Brian J. Zhang, Bastian Orthmann, Ilaria Torre 0002, Roberto Bresin, Jason Fick, Iolanda Leite, Naomi T. Fitter
RO-MAN5
2021 Bringing WALL-E out of the Silver Screen: Understanding How Transformative Robot Sound Affects Human Perception
abstract
Lovable robots in movies regularly beep, chirp, and whirr, yet robots in the real world rarely deploy such sounds. Despite preliminary work supporting the perceptual and objective benefits of intentionally-produced robot sound, relatively little research is ongoing in this area. In this paper, we systematically evaluate transformative robot sound across multiple robot archetypes and behaviors. We conducted a series of five online video-based surveys, each with N≈ 100 participants, to better understand the effects of musician-designed transformative sounds on perceptions of personal, service, and industrial robots. Participants rated robot videos with transformative sound as significantly happier, warmer, and more competent in all five studies, as more energetic in four studies, and as less discomforting in one study. Overall, results confirmed that transformative sounds consistently improve subjective ratings but may convey affect contrary to the intent of affective robot behaviors. In future work, we will investigate the repeatability of these results through in-person studies and develop methods to automatically generate transformative robot sound. This work may benefit researchers and designers who aim to make robots more favorable to human users.
Brian J. Zhang, Nick Stargu, Samuel Brimhall, Lilian Chan, Jason Fick, Naomi T. Fitter
ICRA5