Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timo Bachmann

dblp:304/4460 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0009-0007-3451-0833ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 46% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% Robot manipulation · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
assembly
0.512021
Flexible Robotic Assembly Based on Ontological Representation of Tasks, Skills, and Resources · KR 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.512021
Flexible Robotic Assembly Based on Ontological Representation of Tasks, Skills, and Resources · KR 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology engineering
0.512021
Flexible Robotic Assembly Based on Ontological Representation of Tasks, Skills, and Resources · KR 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
workcell layout planning
0.512021
Automated Planning of Workcell Layouts Considering Task Sequences · ICRA 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.112021
Flexible Robotic Assembly Based on Ontological Representation of Tasks, Skills, and Resources · KR 2021
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization
0.112021
Automated Planning of Workcell Layouts Considering Task Sequences · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

genetic algorithm · 1.0ontological modeling · 0.5knowledge reuse · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Automated Planning of Workcell Layouts Considering Task Sequences
abstract
The initial design of a robotic workcell layout has a large impact on the feasibility and performance of the intended robotic tasks. We define this layout design as a constrained nonlinear optimization problem that aims to optimize the placement of workcell components by minimizing the distance traveled between task sequences while maximizing the robot’s manipulability. Suitable constraints guarantee the reachability as well as the absence of collisions. We solve this optimization problem via a genetic algorithm, and demonstrate it in three scenarios for a dual-arm robotic system that assembles product variants out of aluminum profiles.
Timo Bachmann, Korbinian Nottensteiner, Máximo A. Roa
ICRA1
2021 Flexible Robotic Assembly Based on Ontological Representation of Tasks, Skills, and Resources
abstract
Technology has sufficiently matured to enable, in principle, flexible and autonomous robotic assembly systems. However, in practice, it requires making all the relevant (implicit) knowledge that system engineers and workers have – about products to be assembled, tasks to be performed, as well as robots and their skills – available to the system explicitly. Only then can the planning and execution components of a robotic assembly pipeline communicate with each other in the same language and solve tasks autonomously without human intervention. This is why we have developed the Factory of the Future (FoF) ontology. At its core, this ontology models the tasks that are necessary to assemble a product and the robotic skills that can be employed to complete said tasks. The FoF ontology is based on existing standards. We started with theoretical considerations and iteratively adapted it based on practical experience gained from incorporating more and more components required for automated planning and assembly. Furthermore, we propose tools to extend the ontology for specific scenarios with knowledge about parts, robots, tools, and skills from various sources. The resulting scenario ontology serves us as world model for the robotic systems and other components of the assembly process. A central runtime interface to this world model provides fast and easy access to the knowledge during execution. In this work, we also show the integration of a graphical user front-end, an assembly planner, a workspace reconfigurator, and more components of the assembly pipeline that all communicate with the help of the FoF ontology. Overall, our integration of the FoF ontology with the other components of a robotic assembly pipeline shows that using an ontology is a practical method to establish a common language and understanding between the involved components.
Philipp Matthias Schäfer, Franz Steinmetz, Stefan Schneyer, Timo Bachmann, Thomas Eiband, Florian Samuel Lay, Abhishek Padalkar, Christoph Sürig, Freek Stulp, Korbinian Nottensteiner
KR4