EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aidan Scannell
dblp:304/4471
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8393-7776ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 54% Motion planning and robot control · 18% Representation and self-supervised learning · 8% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Discrete Codebook World Models for Continuous Control · ICLR 2025 Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
decision-time planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete Codebook World Models for Continuous Control · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › discrete representation learning
discrete latent representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete Codebook World Models for Continuous Control · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Entropy Regularized Task Representation Learning for Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete Codebook World Models for Continuous Control · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
offline meta-reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Entropy Regularized Task Representation Learning for Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
task representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Entropy Regularized Task Representation Learning for Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete Codebook World Models for Continuous Control · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Trajectory Optimisation in Learned Multimodal Dynamical Systems via Latent-ODE Collocation · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Trajectory Optimisation in Learned Multimodal Dynamical Systems via Latent-ODE Collocation · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Trajectory Optimisation in Learned Multimodal Dynamical Systems via Latent-ODE Collocation · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual information minimization · 0.9model predictive control · 0.9entropy regularization · 0.9discrete codebook · 0.9sparsification · 0.8gaussian process · 0.8function-space parameterization · 0.8mixture of gaussian process experts · 0.5latent ODE collocation · 0.5geodesic ODE · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Entropy Regularized Task Representation Learning for Offline Meta-Reinforcement LearningabstractOffline meta-reinforcement learning aims to equip agents with the ability to rapidly adapt to new tasks by training on data from a set of different tasks. Context-based approaches utilize a history of state-action-reward transitions – referred to as the context – to infer a representation of the current task, and then condition the agent, i.e., the policy and value function, on this task representation. Intuitively, the better the task representation captures the underlying tasks, the better the agent can generalize to new tasks. Unfortunately, context-based approaches suffer from distribution mismatch, as the context in the offline data does not match the context at test time, limiting their ability to generalize to the test task. This leads to the task representation overfitting to the offline training data. Intuitively, the task representation should be independent of the behavior policy used to collect the offline data. To address this issue, we approximately minimize the mutual information between the distribution over the task representation and behavior policy by maximizing the entropy of behavior policy conditioned on the task representation. We validate our approach in MuJoCo environments, showing that compared to baselines, our task representation more faithfully represents the underlying tasks, leading to outperforming prior methods in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution tasks. Mohammadreza Nakhaei, Aidan Scannell, Joni Pajarinen |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Discrete Codebook World Models for Continuous ControlabstractIn reinforcement learning (RL), world models serve as internal simulators, enabling agents to predict environment dynamics and future outcomes in order to make informed decisions. While previous approaches leveraging discrete latent spaces, such as DreamerV3, have demonstrated strong performance in discrete action settings and visual control tasks, their comparative performance in state-based continuous control remains underexplored. In contrast, methods with continuous latent spaces, such as TD-MPC2, have shown notable success in state-based continuous control benchmarks. In this paper, we demonstrate that modeling discrete latent states has benefits over continuous latent states and that discrete codebook encodings are more effective representations for continuous control, compared to alternative encodings, such as one-hot and label-based encodings. Based on these insights, we introduce DCWM: Discrete Codebook World Model, a self-supervised world model with a discrete and stochastic latent space, where latent states are codes from a codebook. We combine DCWM with decision-time planning to get our model-based RL algorithm, named DC-MPC: Discrete Codebook Model Predictive Control, which performs competitively against recent state-of-the-art algorithms, including TD-MPC2 and DreamerV3, on continuous control benchmarks. Aidan Scannell, Mohammadreza Nakhaei, Kalle Kujanpää, Yi Zhao 0014, Kevin S. Luck, Arno Solin, Joni Pajarinen |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential LearningabstractSequential learning paradigms pose challenges for gradient-based deep learning due to difficulties incorporating new data and retaining prior knowledge. While Gaussian processes elegantly tackle these problems, they struggle with scalability and handling rich inputs, such as images. To address these issues, we introduce a technique that converts neural networks from weight space to function space, through a dual parameterization. Our parameterization offers: (*i*) a way to scale function-space methods to large data sets via sparsification, (*ii*) retention of prior knowledge when access to past data is limited, and (*iii*) a mechanism to incorporate new data without retraining. Our experiments demonstrate that we can retain knowledge in continual learning and incorporate new data efficiently. We further show its strengths in uncertainty quantification and guiding exploration in model-based RL. Further information and code is available on the project website. Aidan Scannell, Riccardo Mereu, Paul E. Chang, Ella Tamir, Joni Pajarinen, Arno Solin |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Mode-constrained Model-based Reinforcement Learning via Gaussian ProcessesabstractModel-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms do not typically consider environments with multiple dynamic modes, where it is beneficial to avoid inoperable or undesirable modes. We present a model-based RL algorithm that constrains training to a single dynamic mode with high probability. This is a difficult problem because the mode constraint is a hidden variable associated with the environment’s dynamics. As such, it is 1) unknown a priori and 2) we do not observe its output from the environment, so cannot learn it with supervised learning. We present a nonparametric dynamic model which learns the mode constraint alongside the dynamic modes. Importantly, it learns latent structure that our planning scheme leverages to 1) enforce the mode constraint with high probability, and 2) escape local optima induced by the mode constraint. We validate our method by showing that it can solve a simulated quadcopter navigation task whilst providing a level of constraint satisfaction both during and after training. Aidan Scannell, Carl Henrik Ek, Arthur G. Richards |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | Trajectory Optimisation in Learned Multimodal Dynamical Systems via Latent-ODE CollocationabstractThis paper presents a two-stage method to perform trajectory optimisation in multimodal dynamical systems with unknown nonlinear stochastic transition dynamics. The method finds trajectories that remain in a preferred dynamics mode where possible and in regions of the transition dynamics model that have been observed and can be predicted confidently. The first stage leverages a Mixture of Gaussian Process Experts method to learn a predictive dynamics model from historical data. Importantly, this model learns a gating function that indicates the probability of being in a particular dynamics mode at a given state location. This gating function acts as a coordinate map for a latent Riemannian manifold on which shortest trajectories are solutions to our trajectory optimisation problem. Based on this intuition, the second stage formulates a geometric cost function, which it then implicitly minimises by projecting the trajectory optimisation onto the second-order geodesic ODE; a classic result of Riemannian geometry. A set of collocation constraints are derived that ensure trajectories are solutions to this ODE, implicitly solving the trajectory optimisation problem. Aidan Scannell, Carl Henrik Ek, Arthur G. Richards |
ICRA | 1 |