Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thibaud Porphyre

dblp:304/4492 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8552-9899ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
sensitivity analysis
0.712023
Development and Evaluation of Two Approaches of Visual Sensitivity Analysis to Support Epidemiological Modeling · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
0.712023
Development and Evaluation of Two Approaches of Visual Sensitivity Analysis to Support Epidemiological Modeling · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Medical and health informatics
epidemic modeling
0.212023
Development and Evaluation of Two Approaches of Visual Sensitivity Analysis to Support Epidemiological Modeling · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual sensitivity analysis · 1.3algorithm-assisted visualization · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 iPAR: A framework for modelling and inferring information about disease spread when the populations at risk are unknown
abstract
We introduce the inference for populations at risk (iPAR) framework which enables modelling and estimation of spatial disease dynamics in scenarios where the population at risk is unknown or poorly mapped. This framework addresses a gap in spatial infectious disease modelling approaches, with current methods typically requiring data on the spatial distribution of the population at risk. The principles for iPAR are demonstrated in the context of a susceptible-infected disease dynamics model coupled with Bayesian inference implemented via data-augmentation Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). This implementation of iPAR is tested for a range of scenarios using simulated outbreak data. Results indicate that the method can effectively estimate key properties of disease spread from spatio-temporal case reports and make useful predictions of future spread. The method is then applied to a case study exploring the 2014-2019 Estonian outbreak of African Swine Fever (ASF) in wild boar. Estimates of epidemiological parameters reveal evidence for long distance transmission, as well as disease control via reduction of the wild boar population in Estonia.
Stephen Catterall, Thibaud Porphyre, Glenn Marion
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2023 Development and Evaluation of Two Approaches of Visual Sensitivity Analysis to Support Epidemiological Modeling
abstract
Computational modeling is a commonly used technology in many scientific disciplines and has played a noticeable role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Modeling scientists conduct sensitivity analysis frequently to observe and monitor the behavior of a model during its development and deployment. The traditional algorithmic ranking of sensitivity of different parameters usually does not provide modeling scientists with sufficient information to understand the interactions between different parameters and model outputs, while modeling scientists need to observe a large number of model runs in order to gain actionable information for parameter optimization. To address the above challenge, we developed and compared two visual analytics approaches, namely: algorithm-centric and visualization-assisted, and visualization-centric and algorithm-assisted. We evaluated the two approaches based on a structured analysis of different tasks in visual sensitivity analysis as well as the feedback of domain experts. While the work was carried out in the context of epidemiological modeling, the two approaches developed in this work are directly applicable to a variety of modeling processes featuring time series outputs, and can be extended to work with models with other types of outputs.
Erik Rydow, Rita Borgo, Hui Fang 0003, Thomas Torsney-Weir, Ben Swallow, Thibaud Porphyre, Cagatay Turkay, Min Chen 0001
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.6