Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haohan Lin
dblp:304/4951
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 42% Language models and text generation · 37% Deep learning architectures and training · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving · ICLR 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
LLM-based theorem proving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving · ICLR 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud registration
gaussian mixture model registration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating Initialization Methods for Discriminative and Fast-Converging HGMM Point Clouds · ICRA 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating Initialization Methods for Discriminative and Fast-Converging HGMM Point Clouds · ICRA 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating Initialization Methods for Discriminative and Fast-Converging HGMM Point Clouds · ICRA 2021 |
Program verification
proof generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 2.6self-taught reasoner · 2.6expert iteration · 2.6hierarchical gaussian mixture model · 0.5expectation-maximization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and ProvingabstractTraditional language model-based theorem proving assumes that by training on a sufficient amount of formal proof data, a model will learn to prove theorems. Our key observation is that a wealth of informal information that is not present in formal proofs can be useful for learning to prove theorems. For instance, humans think through steps of a proof, but this thought process is not visible in the resulting code. We present Lean-STaR, a framework for training language models to produce informal thoughts prior to each step of a proof, thereby boosting the model's theorem-proving capabilities. Lean-STaR uses retrospective ground-truth tactics to generate synthetic thoughts for training the language model. At inference time, the trained model directly generates the thoughts prior to the prediction of the tactics in each proof step. Building on the self-taught reasoner framework, we then apply expert iteration to further fine-tune the model on the correct proofs it samples and verifies using the Lean solver. Lean-STaR significantly outperform base models (43.4% → 46.3%, Pass@64). We also analyze the impact of the augmented thoughts on various aspects of the theorem proving process, providing insights into their effectiveness. Haohan Lin, Zhiqing Sun, Sean Welleck, Yiming Yang 0002 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | A Novel Channel-Constrained Model for 6G Vehicular Networks with Traffic SpikesabstractMobile Edge Computing (MEC) holds excellent potential in Congestion Management (CM) of 6G vehicular networks. A reasonable schedule of MEC ensures a more reliable and efficient CM system. Unfortunately, existing parallel and sequential models cannot cope with scarce computing resources and constrained channels, especially during traffic rush hour. In this paper, we propose a channel-constrained multi-core sequential model (CCMSM) for task offloading and resource allocation. The CCMSM incorporates a utility index that couples system energy consumption and delay, applying Genetic Algorithm combining Sparrow Search Algorithm (GA-SSA) in the branching optimization. Furthermore, we prove that the system delay is the shortest with the FCFS computing strategy in the MEC server. Simulation demonstrates that the proposed CCMSM achieves a higher optimization level and exhibits better robustness and resilient scalability for traffic spikes. Haohan Lin, Desheng Wang 0001 |
WCNC | 3 |
| 2021 | Evaluating Initialization Methods for Discriminative and Fast-Converging HGMM Point Clouds
Haohan Lin, Xuzhan Chen, Matthew Tucsok, Homayoun Najjaran |
ICRA | 1 |